Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $13M | $10M | $207M | $3.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $33M | $59M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $551K | $3M | $-18M | $289M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 25.0% | 4.1% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 0.4% | -26.3% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 219.3x | 13.2x | — | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $92K | $4M | $1.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $6M | $12M | $1.02B |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JE Cleantech Holdin… (JCSE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 9.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 61.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.07, yield 9.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- 6.9% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
CLWT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CLWT's 164.8%
ITRI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 12.3% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 9.1% yield, vs CLWT's 6.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs ITRI's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7% |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ITRI leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • JCSE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 70.4x CLWT's $33M. ITRI is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, ITRI holds the edge at -3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $33M | $59M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $292,750 | -$14M | $367M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $551,000 | $3M | -$18M | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $691,000 | -$14M | $393M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +25.0% | +4.1% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +0.4% | -26.3% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +7.7% | -30.1% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +2.1% | -23.4% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -18.6% | -20.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -66.9% | -110.5% | -16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CLWT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, ITRI trades at a 94% valuation discount to JCSE's 219.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JCSE's 22.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $10M | $207M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $4M | $200M | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 219.30x | 13.16x | -14.89x | 12.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.01x | 7.16x | — | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 0.62x | 3.36x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 0.58x | 4.11x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.72x | 12.27x | — | 9.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRI delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs PESI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +16.2% | -34.5% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +12.8% | -20.2% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +2.6% | -21.7% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +2.3% | -16.7% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$6M | -$7M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $6M | $12M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $92,000 | $4M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.04x | 74.42x | -42.14x | 14.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $361 for JCSE. Over the past 12 months, JCSE leads with a +84.1% total return vs ITRI's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs JCSE's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.1% | +4.2% | -8.8% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.1% | +8.7% | +26.2% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.1% | -9.5% | +21.7% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -28.1% | +45.6% | -7.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +164.8% | +178.6% | +94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | -3.3% | +6.8% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JCSE and CLWT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JCSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLWT currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs JCSE's 43.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.37x | 1.85x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $1.63 | $16.50 | $142.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $0.99 | $8.02 | $78.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.6% | +76.7% | +67.7% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 49.5 | 41.5 | 35.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 832K | 5K | 164K | 893K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JCSE and CLWT and PESI and ITRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", ITRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.8% upside for ITRI (target: $137) vs 61.1% for PESI (target: $18). For income investors, JCSE offers the higher dividend yield at 9.12% vs CLWT's 6.40%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $137.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.1% | +6.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $0.08 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ITRI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI vs ITRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
On trailing P/E, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus JE Cleantech Holdings Limited at 219. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus JCSE's -96. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 2513% more volatile than JCSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 74% for Itron, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -93. 7% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRI leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRI leads at 13. 5% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRI leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRI: 68.
8% to $137. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI?
In this comparison, JCSE (9.
1% yield), CLWT (6. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PESI, ITRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI or ITRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 9. 1% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JCSE: -96. 4%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCSE and CLWT and PESI and ITRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (JCSE (Industrials) and CLWT (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JCSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock. JCSE, CLWT pay a dividend while PESI, ITRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.