Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products |
| Market Cap | $7M | $228.85B | $65.68B | $4.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $34.66B | $12.46B | $6.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $7.13B | $2.11B | $264M |
| Gross Margin | 4.5% | 46.0% | 32.0% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | -16.4% | 28.8% | 18.4% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x | 22.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $26.99B | $18.41B | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226K | $5.06B | $1.86B | $925M |
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jewett-Cameron Trad… (JCTC) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 99.1 | -0.9% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCTC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 4.63x
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs UFPI's 230.6%
- PEG 1.09 vs UFPI's 3.49
- 3.0% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4%
APD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +14.2% vs JCTC's -47.6%
UFPI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs JCTC's -18.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs UFPI's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.2% vs JCTC's -47.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs JCTC's -31.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -13.2% |
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
UFPI leads 1 • APD leads 1 • JCTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 851.8x JCTC's $41M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JCTC's -18.2%. On growth, APD holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $34.7B | $12.5B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $12.1B | $3.9B | $498M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $7.1B | $2.1B | $264M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $5.1B | $1.1B | $298M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +46.0% | +32.0% | +16.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +28.8% | +18.4% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +20.6% | +16.9% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +14.7% | +8.9% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | +8.2% | +8.8% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +13.4% | +141.1% | -31.5% |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 50% valuation discount to LIN's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.33x vs UFPI's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $228.8B | $65.7B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $250.8B | $82.2B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.75x | 33.85x | -166.67x | 16.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x | 22.46x | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | 3.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x | 119.66x | 7.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 6.73x | 5.46x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 5.82x | 3.79x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | — | 17.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LIN and UFPI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-44 for JCTC. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APD's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs JCTC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -44.0% | +17.8% | +11.9% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.9% | +8.3% | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +11.3% | -2.0% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +13.0% | -2.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.68x | 1.06x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $21.9B | $16.6B | -$695M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226,213 | $5.1B | $1.9B | $925M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $27.0B | $18.4B | $230M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 34.52x | 12.00x | 43.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,628 for JCTC. Over the past 12 months, APD leads with a +14.2% total return vs JCTC's -47.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 11.8% vs JCTC's -22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | +15.5% | +19.2% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.6% | +11.2% | +14.2% | -12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +39.7% | +7.0% | +6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +73.9% | +13.2% | +1.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +375.2% | +166.4% | +230.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.7% | +11.8% | +2.3% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UFPI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs JCTC's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.24x | 0.45x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.02 | $521.28 | $307.29 | $118.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.54 | $387.78 | $229.11 | $80.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.0% | +94.7% | +96.0% | +71.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 35.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 2.3M | 1.2M | 379K |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", APD as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for UFPI (target: $103) vs 6.0% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs LIN's 1.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $539.71 | $312.78 | $103.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 42 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.4% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 29 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $7.11 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +9.1% |
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UFPI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Linde plc at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Linde plc wins at 1. 09x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to -53. 7% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus JCTC's -53. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning UFPI is approximately 284% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 106% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -657. 1% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -10. 0% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -9. 1% for JCTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Linde plc (LIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 49x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Linde plc — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UFPI: 22. 8% to $103. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI?
In this comparison, APD (2.
4% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. JCTC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, JCTC: -53. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCTC and LIN and APD and UFPI?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JCTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; APD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock. LIN, APD, UFPI pay a dividend while JCTC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.