Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Financial - Credit Services
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $113M | $5M | $250M | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $300M | $95K | $3.46B | $353M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $-66M | $-178M | $47M |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | -20.4% | 13.6% | 96.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22.8% | -303.1% | 7.3% | 50.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 5.7x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $1M | $170M | $316M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $2M | $1.29B | $202M |
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora Mobile Limit… (JG) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 22.4 | -77.6% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 88.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 0.71x
- Beta 0.33 vs CANG's 2.25
KXIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
- Better valuation composite
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
- 12.2% margin vs KXIN's -694.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs KXIN's -694.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs KXIN's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 17.2% vs -36.0% |
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories
CANG leads 1 • JG leads 0 • KXIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 36417.5x KXIN's $95,000. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $300M | $95,000 | $3.5B | $353M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$78M | -$24M | $333M | $111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | -$66M | -$178M | $47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $554M | -$3M | $0 | $126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.7% | -20.4% | +13.6% | +96.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | -303.1% | +7.3% | +50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.9% | -694.9% | -5.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +184.7% | -32.4% | -154.0% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | — | +58.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.4% | +88.7% | +3.6% | +16.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 5% valuation discount to CANG's 5.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CANG's 3.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $5M | $250M | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $4M | $85M | $340M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.09x | -0.10x | 5.66x | 5.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 7.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 3.13x | 1.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.44x | — | 2.12x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.72x | 0.30x | 0.42x | 0.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 216.38x | — | — | 1.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFIN's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs KXIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.2% | -5.9% | -4.1% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.5% | -3.2% | -2.3% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.0% | -36.0% | +4.6% | +17.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | -44.5% | +4.5% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.08x | 0.04x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$98M | -$1M | -$1.1B | $115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $2M | $1.3B | $202M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $1M | $170M | $316M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -80.09x | -88.45x | -1.87x | 1.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth $12,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, MFIN leads with a +8.2% total return vs KXIN's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 16.7% vs KXIN's -96.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.6% | -95.0% | -62.0% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.7% | -98.8% | -73.7% | +8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.9% | -100.0% | +1.2% | +58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | -100.0% | -14.2% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | -100.0% | -44.9% | +60.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.6% | -96.7% | +0.4% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JG and MFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JG is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFIN currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.11x | 2.25x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.80 | $832.50 | $2.88 | $11.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.85 | $4.10 | $0.33 | $7.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.0% | +0.5% | +18.6% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 33.0 | 58.6 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 38K | 1.3M | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JG as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 5.1% for JG (target: $7). MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | — | $3.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | — | 2 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +5.3% | +0.4% |
MFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CANG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
JG vs KXIN vs CANG vs MFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Cango Inc. at 5. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFIN returned +60. 3% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 582% more volatile than JG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 62% for Medallion Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Medallion Financial Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JG leads at -4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. JG, KXIN, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JG or KXIN or CANG or MFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33)). Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JG: -96. 2%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JG and KXIN and CANG and MFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (JG (Technology) and KXIN (Consumer Cyclical) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. MFIN pays a dividend while JG, KXIN, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.