Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Residential Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.17B | $5.93B | $14.47B | $8.56B | $4.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.40B | $2.95B | $7.68B | $14.82B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $255M | $837M | $292M | $191M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 33.9% | 35.4% | 29.9% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 12.7% | 16.8% | 4.2% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 19.9x | 16.8x | 18.0x | 24.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.21B | $1.05B | $3.44B | $5.65B | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $322M | $647M | $182M | $4M |
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Hardie Indust… (JHX) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 342.2 | +242.2% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JHX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 3.03x
- PEG 0.82 vs TREX's 7.25
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.81x
- Beta 1.28 vs BLDR's 1.66
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and quality.
- 2.0% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- 16.3% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.0% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.9x vs 24.2x), PEG 0.82 vs 7.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs BLDR's 1.66 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs TREX's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs JHX's 0.9%, ROIC 35.4% vs 17.9% |
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • BLDR leads 1 • IBP leads 1 • JHX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 12.6x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, JHX holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $2.9B | $7.7B | $14.8B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $927M | $656M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $309M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $255M | $837M | $292M | $191M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $206M | $63M | $943M | $862M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +33.9% | +35.4% | +29.9% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +12.7% | +16.8% | +4.2% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +8.6% | +10.9% | +2.0% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +5.8% | +20.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | -3.5% | +6.5% | -10.1% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.6% | -21.3% | +20.7% | -151.2% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.6x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 18% valuation discount to IBP's 22.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.93x vs TREX's 6.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $5.9B | $14.5B | $8.6B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $6.7B | $17.3B | $14.0B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.41x | 22.66x | 18.59x | 19.90x | 22.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.13x | 19.88x | 16.79x | 18.03x | 24.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.69x | 0.93x | 3.75x | 2.52x | 6.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.69x | 13.58x | 12.16x | 10.18x | 13.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 1.99x | 1.91x | 0.56x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.19x | 8.38x | 200.89x | 1.99x | 4.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.97x | 19.70x | 16.71x | 10.03x | 31.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for JHX. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +37.5% | +8.0% | +6.9% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +12.2% | +15.9% | +2.6% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | +20.7% | +35.4% | +6.4% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.4% | +22.6% | +35.9% | +8.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 1.48x | 45.81x | 1.30x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $642M | $731M | $2.8B | $5.5B | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $322M | $647M | $182M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.1B | $3.4B | $5.6B | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.23x | 9.47x | 12.60x | 2.19x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,172 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,728 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +37.3% total return vs TREX's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 26.2% vs BLDR's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | -16.9% | +11.8% | -26.0% | +12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | +37.3% | +18.3% | -30.3% | -31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +101.1% | +39.7% | -31.9% | -28.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +81.7% | +15.4% | +48.0% | -62.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.9% | +660.5% | +151.5% | +596.0% | +248.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +26.2% | +11.8% | -12.0% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.31x | 1.28x | 1.66x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.83 | $349.00 | $79.19 | $151.03 | $68.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.46 | $150.83 | $58.16 | $73.40 | $29.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +63.0% | +90.6% | +51.2% | +58.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 28.9 | 59.5 | 42.0 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 345K | 2.7M | 2.4M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JHX as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", MAS as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for BLDR (target: $107) vs 14.2% for IBP (target: $251). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs IBP's 1.47%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.50 | $251.33 | $82.60 | $106.64 | $47.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 27 | 38 | 43 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +1.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.24 | $1.24 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +2.9% | +3.9% | +4.8% | +1.3% |
MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). TREX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
JHX vs IBP vs MAS vs BLDR vs TREX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the stronger pick with 2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.
6x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +81. 7%, compared to -62. 7% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus JHX's +65. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masco Corporation (MAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning BLDR is approximately 30% more volatile than MAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is pulling ahead at 2. 0% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 37. 8% to $106. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. JHX, BLDR, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JHX or IBP or MAS or BLDR or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +660. 5% 10Y return). James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +660. 5%, JHX: +65. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JHX and IBP and MAS and BLDR and TREX?
These companies operate in different sectors (JHX (Basic Materials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IBP, MAS pay a dividend while JHX, BLDR, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.