Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Information Technology Services
Construction
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Construction | Information Technology Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $10.57B | $14.73B | $24.47B | $7.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $4.98B | $10.89B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $519M | $725M | $382M | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 35.6% | 38.1% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 20.1% | 17.5% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 17.2x | 7.5x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.88B | $4.01B | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $1.11B | $599M | $113M |
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Carlisle Companies … (CSL) | 100 | 300.7 | +200.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- Beta 0.28 vs CSL's 1.12
CSL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.2% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.9x)
AWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 330.4% 10Y total return vs CSL's 277.4%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs CSL's 0.3%
- +11.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs CSL's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs CSL's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.5% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0% |
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • AWI leads 1 • CSL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 6.6x AWI's $1.6B. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $5.0B | $10.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $810M | $1.1B | $3.8B | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $519M | $725M | $382M | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $728M | $925M | $2.8B | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +35.6% | +38.1% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +20.1% | +17.5% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +14.6% | +3.5% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +18.6% | +26.1% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -4.0% | +8.2% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | -3.1% | +92.3% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, CSL trades at a 67% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CSL offers better value at 0.87x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.6B | $14.7B | $24.5B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $16.5B | $27.9B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.40x | 21.05x | 63.00x | 23.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.79x | 17.18x | 7.54x | 19.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | 0.87x | 2.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.53x | 13.79x | 7.66x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 2.94x | 2.29x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.01x | 8.67x | 1.76x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.97x | 15.18x | 9.97x | 28.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JKHY and AWI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSL's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs CSL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.0% | +34.5% | +2.7% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.0% | +12.0% | +1.1% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.0% | +20.6% | +6.0% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.7% | +18.7% | +6.6% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.60x | 0.29x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $1.8B | $3.4B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $1.1B | $599M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.9B | $4.0B | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 122.37x | 11.06x | 4.64x | 13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSL five years ago would be worth $19,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, AWI leads with a +11.5% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.8% | +10.1% | -27.3% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | -5.1% | -35.3% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +75.5% | -6.6% | +151.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +95.1% | -63.2% | +63.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.9% | +277.4% | -13.2% | +330.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +20.6% | -2.2% | +36.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and CSL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSL's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSL currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 1.12x | 0.76x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $193.39 | $435.92 | $82.74 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.81 | $293.43 | $43.30 | $148.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +82.7% | +57.1% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.2 | 61.0 | 43.3 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 902K | 386K | 5.5M | 494K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSL and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JKHY as "Buy", CSL as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 13.4% for CSL (target: $409). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.75 | $408.75 | $67.38 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 26 | 37 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.2% | +3.5% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 32 | 37 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.25 | $4.19 | $1.63 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +8.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
JKHY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JKHY vs CSL vs FIS vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
On trailing P/E, Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is the cheapest at 21.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) delivered a total return of +95.
1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Carlisle Companies Incorporated's 1. 12β — meaning CSL is approximately 296% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 160% for Carlisle Companies Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus 0. 3% for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JKHY leads at 42. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).
09Is JKHY or CSL or FIS or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, CSL: +277. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JKHY and CSL and FIS and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (JKHY (Technology) and CSL (Industrials) and FIS (Technology) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CSL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.