Staffing & Employment Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Staffing & Employment Services
Agricultural - Machinery
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $25M | $423.68B | $155.88B | $417M | $13.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $70.75B | $46.86B | $4.13B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $9.42B | $4.78B | $-266M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 32.5% | 35.4% | 19.5% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | 16.6% | 18.4% | -1.9% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 36.9x | 32.0x | 13.3x | 26.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $159M | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $33M | $3.23B |
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 719.8 | +619.8% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 367.5 | +267.5% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 4.12x
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.2%
- PEG 1.31 vs DE's 1.96
- 4.3% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2%
DE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.60 vs CAT's 1.67
KELYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 26.2x)
- 2.6% yield, vs CAT's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CNH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 26.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs CAT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs CAT's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.9% vs CNH's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs -4.0% |
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • JOB leads 0 • DE leads 0 • CNH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 804.2x JOB's $88M. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $70.8B | $46.9B | $4.1B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258,000 | $14.0B | $10.3B | -$35M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $9.4B | $4.8B | -$266M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $11.4B | $3.8B | $66M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +32.5% | +35.4% | +19.5% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +16.6% | +18.4% | -1.9% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +13.3% | +10.2% | -6.4% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +16.2% | +8.0% | +1.6% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | +22.2% | +6.7% | -10.7% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +30.2% | -1.4% | -2.1% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.9x trailing earnings, CNH trades at a 47% valuation discount to CAT's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.72x vs DE's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $423.7B | $155.9B | $417M | $13.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $457.0B | $211.5B | $544M | $37.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | 48.36x | 31.22x | -1.66x | 25.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.94x | 31.95x | 13.34x | 26.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.72x | 1.91x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.92x | 19.87x | — | 10.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 6.27x | 3.49x | 0.10x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 20.03x | 6.03x | 0.43x | 1.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.21x | 41.24x | 48.25x | 3.66x | 6.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. JOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DE scores 6/9 vs KELYA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +47.5% | +18.2% | -24.6% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +10.0% | +4.5% | -11.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | +15.9% | +7.8% | -4.0% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | +19.1% | +11.7% | -4.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.16x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $126M | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $33M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $159M | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.91x | 9.22x | 3.07x | -8.78x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $42,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,712 for JOB. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +153.9% total return vs CNH's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 57.4% vs JOB's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +52.7% | +24.1% | +41.1% | +14.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +153.9% | +13.0% | +3.0% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | +289.8% | +53.9% | -28.6% | -17.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | +327.7% | +80.1% | -46.1% | -29.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +1168.9% | +624.8% | -24.0% | +75.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | +57.4% | +15.4% | -10.6% | -6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.67x | 0.60x | 0.92x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $946.83 | $674.19 | $14.94 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $355.70 | $433.00 | $7.98 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +96.2% | +85.7% | +80.6% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 52.5 | 50.6 | 70.7 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 2.4M | 1.1M | 422K | 12.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -3.1% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, KELYA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.60% vs CAT's 0.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $882.20 | $690.00 | $15.00 | $13.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 46 | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +1.1% | +2.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 32 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | $0.31 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JOB vs CAT vs DE vs KELYA vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (26. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
On trailing P/E, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the cheapest at 25. 9x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 31x versus Deere & Company's 1. 96x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +327. 7%, compared to -62. 9% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1169% versus JOB's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning CAT is approximately 179% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caterpillar Inc. grew EPS -14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -36. 0% for GEE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus -2. 9% for JOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 31x versus Deere & Company's 1. 96x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 36. 9x for Caterpillar Inc. — 23. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 24. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH?
In this comparison, KELYA (2.
6% yield), CNH (2. 5% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. JOB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOB or CAT or DE or KELYA or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 1% yield, +624. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +624. 8%, JOB: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOB and CAT and DE and KELYA and CNH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CAT, DE, KELYA, CNH pay a dividend while JOB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.