Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Home Improvement
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Home Improvement | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $2.16B | $40M | $481M | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.24B | $10.29B | $442M | $6.11B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-146M | $800M | $22M | $-153M | $-202M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 37.7% | 33.0% | 12.7% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | -18.1% | 12.7% | 3.9% | -3.4% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 1.1x | 2.7x | 4.0x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $129M | $216M | $49M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $445M | $5.44B | $9M | $1.19B | $1.02B |
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOYY, Inc. Sponsore… (JOYY) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 46.8% 10Y total return vs MOMO's -9.4%
- -1.3% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- Beta 0.64 vs LIVE's 1.23, lower leverage
- +50.9% vs DOYU's -34.2%
MOMO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.3x)
- 7.8% margin vs JOYY's -6.5%
LIVE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth 158.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 5.7% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC 3.5% vs -15.4%
Among these 5 stocks, HUYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.3% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs JOYY's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs LIVE's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs DOYU's -34.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC 3.5% vs -15.4% |
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories
JOYY leads 2 • DOYU leads 1 • LIVE leads 0 • HUYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 23.3x LIVE's $442M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JOYY's -6.5%. On growth, DOYU holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $10.3B | $442M | $6.1B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$317M | $1.4B | $29M | -$120M | -$275M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$146M | $800M | $22M | -$153M | -$202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $685M | $22M | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +37.7% | +33.0% | +12.7% | +9.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.1% | +12.7% | +3.9% | -3.4% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +7.8% | +5.0% | -2.5% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +6.7% | +5.0% | -1.9% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -5.1% | -2.7% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.2% | +32.1% | -112.5% | -118.5% | +179.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MOMO and LIVE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 71% valuation discount to MOMO's 9.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIVE's 7.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $2.2B | $40M | $481M | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $1.4B | $248M | $314M | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.69x | 9.34x | 2.67x | -103.70x | -3.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.62x | 1.08x | — | 3.97x | 4.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.27x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.91x | 7.77x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 1.46x | 0.09x | 0.54x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.60x | 0.67x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.14x | 21.90x | 1.93x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DOYU. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +7.2% | +23.3% | -2.4% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +5.3% | +5.7% | -1.7% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +10.9% | +3.5% | -1.7% | -15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +10.8% | +5.3% | -2.1% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 2.27x | 0.01x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$414M | -$5.3B | $208M | -$1.1B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $445M | $5.4B | $9M | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $129M | $216M | $49M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 30.37x | 18.04x | 5.01x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JOYY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOYY five years ago would be worth $8,013 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,841 for DOYU. Over the past 12 months, JOYY leads with a +50.9% total return vs DOYU's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs LIVE's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +1.6% | -16.2% | +5.6% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.9% | +16.2% | -9.2% | +26.9% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.0% | -5.7% | -56.1% | +99.7% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.9% | -36.7% | -64.9% | -60.8% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.8% | -9.4% | +33.0% | -60.1% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.6% | -1.9% | -24.0% | +25.9% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
JOYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIVE's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JOYY currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs DOYU's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.78x | 1.23x | 1.17x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.96 | $9.22 | $25.88 | $4.93 | $9.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.77 | $5.68 | $7.01 | $2.21 | $4.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +68.8% | +50.9% | +64.9% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 61.2 | 42.2 | 54.2 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 282K | 648K | 5K | 1.0M | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOYY as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MOMO's 4.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.00 | $8.10 | — | $3.45 | $9.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 16 | — | 15 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.6% | — | +56.7% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | — | $12.34 | $68.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +5.1% | +1.3% | +7.6% | +10.9% |
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JOYY leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
JOYY vs MOMO vs LIVE vs HUYA vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JOYY, Inc.
Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) is the stronger pick with -1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JOYY, Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Hello Group Inc. at 9. 3x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
Over the past 5 years, JOYY, Inc.
Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) delivered a total return of -19. 9%, compared to -71. 6% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JOYY returned +46. 8% versus DOYU's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JOYY, Inc.
Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Live Ventures Incorporated's 1. 23β — meaning LIVE is approximately 91% more volatile than JOYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JOYY, Inc.
Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) is pulling ahead at -1. 3% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -7. 0% for DouYu International Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -18. 1% for JOYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. JOYY, LIVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOYY or MOMO or LIVE or HUYA or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, LIVE: +33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOYY and MOMO and LIVE and HUYA and DOYU?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOYY (Communication Services) and MOMO (Communication Services) and LIVE (Consumer Cyclical) and HUYA (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOYY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MOMO, HUYA, DOYU pay a dividend while JOYY, LIVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.