Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Discount Stores
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $25M | $1.04T | $57.06B | $447.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $286.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $8.55B |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 44.8x | 15.7x | 49.4x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $8.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $702K | $10.73B | $5.49B | $14.16B |
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coffee Holding Co.,… (JVA) | 100 | 158.0 | +58.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Costco Wholesale Co… (COST) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth -35.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
- 22.6% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 0.7%
- +35.1% vs COST's +0.6%
TGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 44.8x)
- 3.8% margin vs JVA's 1.9%
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
COST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 28.0%, current ratio 1.03x
- PEG 3.27 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.10, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 44.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs JVA's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs JVA's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs COST's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs JVA's 4.5%, ROIC 34.5% vs 5.3% |
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories
COST leads 1 • JVA leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 6992.6x JVA's $101M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (TGT) to 1.9% (JVA). On growth, JVA holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $286.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $42.8B | $8.7B | $13.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $22.9B | $4.0B | $8.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +12.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.0% | +35.1% | +23.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 72% valuation discount to COST's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COST offers better value at 3.67x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $1.04T | $57.1B | $447.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $1.10T | $57.2B | $441.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.76x | 47.76x | 15.41x | 55.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.77x | 15.66x | 49.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.34x | — | 3.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.08x | 24.88x | 7.22x | 34.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 1.46x | 0.54x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 10.47x | 3.53x | 15.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.00x | 20.13x | 57.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COST delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $7 for JVA. COST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COST scores 7/9 vs JVA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +22.3% | +26.1% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +7.9% | +6.9% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +34.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +27.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $56.4B | $104M | -$6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $701,872 | $10.7B | $5.5B | $14.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $8.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.97x | 11.85x | 12.40x | 77.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JVA and WMT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,828 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +35.1% total return vs COST's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JVA at 39.9% vs TGT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.5% | +16.1% | +25.7% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.5% | +35.1% | +33.9% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +161.3% | -11.4% | +108.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.7% | +186.6% | -31.7% | +174.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.8% | +501.4% | +98.7% | +622.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +37.7% | -4.0% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and COST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COST is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JVA's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs JVA's 78.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.11x | 0.94x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.63 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $1067.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.93 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $846.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +96.8% | +94.1% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 56.2 | 50.5 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 17.1M | 4.5M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", COST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.1% upside for COST (target: $1070) vs -7.8% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs COST's 0.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $115.44 | $1070.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 37 | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | $4.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
JVA vs WMT vs TGT vs COST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JVA or WMT or TGT or COST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coffee Holding Co.
, Inc. (JVA) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Costco Wholesale Corporation wins at 3. 27x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 6%, compared to -31. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +622. 8% versus JVA's +21. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Coffee Holding Co. , Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning JVA is approximately 1135% more volatile than COST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coffee Holding Co.
, Inc. (JVA) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -35. 9% for Coffee Holding Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JVA leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus 1. 5% for Coffee Holding Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus 2. 2% for JVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JVA or WMT or TGT or COST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 27x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 49. 4x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COST: 6. 1% to $1070. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — JVA or WMT or TGT or COST?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), COST (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. JVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JVA or WMT or TGT or COST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, JVA: +21. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JVA and WMT and TGT and COST?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, TGT pay a dividend while JVA, COST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.