Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JYD vs CHRW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
JYD vs CHRW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $11M | $20.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $16.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | 1.3% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $161M |
JYD vs CHRW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayud Global Logist… (JYD) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 169.9 | +69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JYD vs CHRW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JYD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth -5.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.6%
- 3.4% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4%
CHRW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.4%
- 163.6% 10Y total return vs JYD's -97.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 88.3%, current ratio 1.53x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs JYD's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs JYD's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.6% vs JYD's -55.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs JYD's -30.6%, ROIC 18.0% vs -33.1% |
JYD vs CHRW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JYD vs CHRW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 16.0x JYD's $1.0B. CHRW is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JYD's -5.3%. On growth, JYD holds the edge at +113.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $896M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $858M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.3% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
JYD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $21.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.18x | 35.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 11.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW delivers a 33.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-102 for JYD. JYD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHRW's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHRW scores 7/9 vs JYD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.8% | +33.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.1% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.5% | +25.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.25x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHRW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHRW five years ago would be worth $18,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $238 for JYD. Over the past 12 months, CHRW leads with a +98.6% total return vs JYD's -55.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHRW at 20.2% vs JYD's -68.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.5% | +98.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +163.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.2% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CHRW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRW is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JYD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHRW currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs JYD's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $203.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.38 | $86.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
CHRW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CHRW is the only dividend payer here at 1.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
CHRW leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JYD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
JYD vs CHRW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JYD or CHRW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) is the stronger pick with 3.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JYD or CHRW?
Over the past 5 years, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to -97. 6% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHRW returned +163. 6% versus JYD's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JYD or CHRW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Jayud Global Logistics Limited's 1. 88β — meaning JYD is approximately 98% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 88% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JYD or CHRW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) is pulling ahead at 3.
4% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to -553. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, JYD leads at -3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JYD or CHRW?
C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -5. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHRW leads at 4. 9% versus -5. 8% for JYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHRW leads at 8. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JYD or CHRW?
In this comparison, CHRW (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. JYD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is JYD or CHRW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 4% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRW: +163. 6%, JYD: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JYD and CHRW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CHRW pays a dividend while JYD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.