Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Marine Shipping
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Biotechnology | Marine Shipping | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $11M | $40M | $1.58B | $2.61B | $20.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $0.00 | $720M | $3.73B | $11.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-210M | $-26M | $105M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 1.3% | — | 33.2% | 48.7% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | — | 23.7% | 3.8% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 351.3x | 26.2x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $1M | $2.57B | $509M | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $258M | $151M | $98M | $1.31B |
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayud Global Logist… (JYD) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Galecto, Inc. (GLTO) | 100 | 56.8 | -43.2% |
| SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
| Expeditors Internat… (EXPD) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JYD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GLTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 12.98x
- +8.3% vs JYD's -55.5%
SFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 7.9%
- Beta 0.67, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.36x
- Beta 0.67 vs JYD's 1.88
- 7.9% yield, vs EXPD's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, HUBG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EXPD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 4.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.4%
- 238.1% 10Y total return vs SFL's 56.4%
- PEG 3.18 vs HUBG's 21.49
- 4.4% revenue growth vs GLTO's -8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs GLTO's -8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 26.2x), PEG 3.18 vs 21.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs JYD's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs JYD's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, vs EXPD's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.3% vs JYD's -55.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.4% ROA vs GLTO's -279.5% |
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFL leads in 3 of 6 categories
EXPD leads 1 • JYD leads 0 • GLTO leads 0 • HUBG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPD and GLTO operate at a comparable scale, with $11.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. EXPD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JYD's -5.3%. On growth, JYD holds the edge at +113.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $0 | $720M | $3.7B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | -$37M | $414M | $331M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$210M | -$26M | $105M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | -$7M | $220M | $113M | $921M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | — | +33.2% | +48.7% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | — | +23.7% | +3.8% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | — | -3.7% | +2.8% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | — | +30.5% | +3.0% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.3% | — | -24.1% | -5.3% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +139.6% | -123.3% | +20.5% | +16.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFL and EXPD each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.3x trailing earnings, HUBG trades at a 1% valuation discount to EXPD's 25.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXPD offers better value at 3.23x vs HUBG's 20.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $40M | $1.6B | $2.6B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | -$216M | $4.0B | $3.0B | $19.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.18x | -6.28x | -59.55x | 25.30x | 25.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 351.33x | 26.22x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 20.74x | 3.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 10.52x | 9.06x | 17.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | — | 2.20x | 0.66x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.24x | 1.65x | 1.55x | 8.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.20x | 18.15x | 21.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD delivers a 36.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GLTO. GLTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFL's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXPD scores 8/9 vs GLTO's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.8% | -3.1% | -2.8% | +6.1% | +36.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.6% | -2.8% | -0.7% | +3.7% | +17.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.1% | — | +2.8% | +5.1% | +48.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.5% | -28.5% | +4.4% | +6.1% | +38.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.01x | 2.67x | 0.30x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$256M | $2.4B | $410M | -$744M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $258M | $151M | $98M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $1M | $2.6B | $509M | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.25x | — | 1.18x | 11.77x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFL five years ago would be worth $20,259 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $238 for JYD. Over the past 12 months, GLTO leads with a +825.9% total return vs JYD's -55.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFL at 18.8% vs JYD's -68.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +14.6% | +53.5% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.5% | +825.9% | +55.1% | +37.5% | +42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -51.0% | +67.6% | +20.2% | +34.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -81.4% | +102.6% | +21.2% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -93.3% | +56.4% | +122.3% | +238.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.2% | -21.2% | +18.8% | +6.3% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SFL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFL is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JYD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs JYD's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.03x | 0.67x | 1.21x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $38.33 | $11.96 | $53.26 | $167.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.38 | $2.45 | $6.73 | $31.52 | $106.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +65.2% | +99.5% | +80.8% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 45.8 | 71.8 | 58.7 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 111K | 1.3M | 723K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFL and EXPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLTO as "Buy", SFL as "Hold", HUBG as "Hold", EXPD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.7% upside for GLTO (target: $44) vs -7.7% for EXPD (target: $140). For income investors, SFL offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs EXPD's 1.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.67 | $14.50 | $44.33 | $140.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 9 | 31 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +7.9% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 0 | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | $0.49 | $1.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +3.0% | +3.3% |
SFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). EXPD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
JYD vs GLTO vs SFL vs HUBG vs EXPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) offers the better valuation at 25. 3x trailing P/E (26. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galecto, Inc. (GLTO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
On trailing P/E, Hub Group, Inc.
(HUBG) is the cheapest at 25. 3x versus Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. at 25. 5x. On forward P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. wins at 3. 18x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
Over the past 5 years, SFL Corporation Ltd.
(SFL) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -97. 6% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPD returned +238. 1% versus JYD's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SFL Corporation Ltd.
(SFL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Jayud Global Logistics Limited's 1. 88β — meaning JYD is approximately 180% more volatile than SFL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Galecto, Inc. (GLTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Galecto, Inc. grew EPS 78. 5% year-over-year, compared to -553. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFL leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -5. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFL leads at 19. 0% versus -5. 8% for JYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBG leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 18x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) trades at 25. 1x forward P/E versus 351. 3x for SFL Corporation Ltd. — 326. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLTO: 74. 7% to $43. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD?
In this comparison, SFL (7.
9% yield), HUBG (1. 2% yield), EXPD (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. JYD, GLTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JYD or GLTO or SFL or HUBG or EXPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +238. 1% 10Y return). Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +238. 1%, JYD: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JYD and GLTO and SFL and HUBG and EXPD?
These companies operate in different sectors (JYD (Industrials) and GLTO (Healthcare) and SFL (Industrials) and HUBG (Industrials) and EXPD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLTO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUBG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SFL, HUBG, EXPD pay a dividend while JYD, GLTO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.