Tobacco
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Tobacco
Tobacco
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Tobacco | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Tobacco | Tobacco |
| Market Cap | $238K | $1.04T | $57.36B | $119K | $115.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $332K | $703.06B | $106.25B | $19M | $21.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-4M | $8.05B |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 24.9% | 27.3% | -15.2% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -62.0% | 50.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x | 15.7x | — | 12.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $67.09B | $5.59B | $4M | $25.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $534K | $10.73B | $5.49B | $7M | $4.48B |
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaival Brands Innov… (KAVL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 278.0 | +178.0% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
| 22nd Century Group,… (XXII) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Altria Group, Inc. (MO) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KAVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 100.0% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs TGT's 99.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs XXII's 1.60
TGT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +36.6% vs XXII's -99.8%
XXII is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 48.1%, EPS growth 99.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -24.3%
- Beta 1.60, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.42x
- 48.1% revenue growth vs KAVL's -99.3%
MO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.08 vs WMT's 4.06
- Better valuation composite
- 36.9% margin vs KAVL's -39.7%
- 23.5% ROA vs KAVL's -208.3%, ROIC 60.4% vs -242.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.1% revenue growth vs KAVL's -99.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs KAVL's -39.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs XXII's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs XXII's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.5% ROA vs KAVL's -208.3%, ROIC 60.4% vs -242.7% |
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MO leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMT leads 1 • KAVL leads 0 • TGT leads 0 • XXII leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 2117500.5x KAVL's $332,024. MO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KAVL's -39.7%. On growth, XXII holds the edge at +80.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $332,024 | $703.1B | $106.2B | $19M | $21.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $42.8B | $8.7B | -$11M | $11.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$4M | $8.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $15.3B | $2.9B | -$8M | $8.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +24.9% | +27.3% | -15.2% | +67.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -62.0% | +50.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.7% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -20.5% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +2.2% | +2.8% | -40.8% | +39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.1% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +80.4% | +20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.7% | +35.1% | +23.7% | +58.0% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — XXII and MO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MO offers better value at 1.48x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $238,223 | $1.04T | $57.4B | $118,791 | $115.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$296,183 | $1.09T | $57.5B | -$3M | $136.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 47.69x | 15.49x | -0.01x | 16.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x | 15.74x | — | 12.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — | 1.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x | 7.26x | — | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.10x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 0.01x | 5.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 0.01x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 20.23x | — | 12.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-2 for KAVL. XXII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KAVL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +22.3% | +26.1% | -25.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -14.2% | +23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +14.7% | +16.7% | -81.4% | +60.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +17.5% | +13.6% | -72.6% | +57.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.27x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$534,406 | $56.4B | $104M | -$3M | $21.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $534,406 | $10.7B | $5.5B | $7M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $67.1B | $5.6B | $4M | $25.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2550.01x | 11.85x | 12.40x | -10.14x | 10.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XXII. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs XXII's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs XXII's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.3% | +15.7% | +26.4% | -94.6% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.8% | +32.7% | +36.6% | -99.8% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +160.5% | -11.0% | -100.0% | +74.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -100.0% | +77.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +499.5% | +99.5% | -100.0% | +62.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -88.7% | +37.6% | -3.8% | -99.0% | +20.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and MO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MO is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XXII's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs XXII's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.17x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 1.60x | -0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.16 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $455.40 | $74.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $0.67 | $54.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +0.2% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 15.1 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 1.4M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KAVL and WMT and XXII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", MO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.3% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, KAVL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $115.31 | — | $68.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.7% | +3.6% | +100.0% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 22 | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.94 | $4.51 | $25.42 | $4.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
MO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
KAVL vs WMT vs TGT vs XXII vs MO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 22nd Century Group, Inc.
(XXII) is the stronger pick with 48. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 3% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. (KAVL). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Altria Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Altria Group, Inc. wins at 1. 08x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for 22nd Century Group, Inc. (XXII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus XXII's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 29β versus 22nd Century Group, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning XXII is approximately -656% more volatile than MO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 22nd Century Group, Inc. (XXII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 22nd Century Group, Inc.
(XXII) is pulling ahead at 48. 1% versus -99. 3% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. (KAVL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 22nd Century Group, Inc. grew EPS 99. 9% year-over-year, compared to -37. 2% for Altria Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 5% net margin versus -356. 2% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MO leads at 74. 8% versus -365. 3% for KAVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KAVL leads at 1037%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Altria Group, Inc. (MO) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. (KAVL) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is KAVL or WMT or TGT or XXII or MO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 29), 6. 0% yield). 22nd Century Group, Inc. (XXII) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MO: +62. 3%, XXII: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KAVL and WMT and TGT and XXII and MO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KAVL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; XXII is a small-cap high-growth stock; MO is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $20B
- Revenue Growth > 40%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.