Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $931M | $13.37B | $348.25B | $892.31B | $421.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198M | $2.63B | $49.28B | $280.33B | $191.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $89M | $1.15B | $13.70B | $57.05B | $30.51B |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 70.8% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 65.6% | 66.2% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 9.7x | 24.7x | 14.3x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $15.99B | $45.49B | $942.38B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $924M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $231.84B |
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kayne Anderson BDC,… (KBDC) | 100 | 87.7 | -12.3% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 86.3 | -13.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 139.7 | +39.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 12.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 0.82x
- Beta 0.52, yield 12.5%, current ratio 0.82x
- NIM 6.3% vs BAC's 1.8%
ARCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs KBDC's 0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.0%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 475.6% 10Y total return vs BAC's 376.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.21
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +28.3% vs ARCC's -3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.9% margin vs BAC's 15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.3% vs ARCC's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KBDC's 0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.0% |
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KBDC leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ARCC leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KBDC and ARCC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1418.2x KBDC's $198M. KBDC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAC's 15.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198M | $2.6B | $49.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $130M | $2.0B | $15.5B | $81.4B | $40.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $89M | $1.1B | $13.7B | $57.0B | $30.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $1.1B | $12.6B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.3% | +70.8% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +66.2% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +43.7% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.6% | +43.5% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | -63.9% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KBDC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, ARCC trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $931M | $13.4B | $348.2B | $892.3B | $421.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $28.4B | $383.5B | $1.49T | $555.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.55x | 10.01x | 26.62x | 15.93x | 14.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.62x | 9.72x | 24.75x | 14.34x | 12.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.97x | 2.38x | 0.90x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.82x | 12.98x | 25.89x | 18.32x | 13.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.95x | 4.25x | 7.26x | 3.19x | 2.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.91x | 10.18x | 2.46x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.71x | 65.76x | 8.85x | 33.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $0 for KBDC. KBDC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs KBDC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +8.1% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +3.8% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +5.7% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +7.5% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 1.12x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $15.1B | $35.2B | $599.0B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $924M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $16.0B | $45.5B | $942.4B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.70x | 2.98x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,071 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,755 for KBDC. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +28.3% total return vs ARCC's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.7% vs KBDC's 2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | -4.2% | +18.6% | -0.9% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.1% | -3.7% | +17.7% | +20.3% | +28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +30.7% | +42.6% | +133.8% | +100.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +44.6% | +63.1% | +120.7% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +153.0% | +118.2% | +475.6% | +376.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | +9.3% | +12.6% | +32.7% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.69x | -0.20x | 0.94x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.28 | $23.42 | $84.04 | $337.25 | $57.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.06 | $17.40 | $65.35 | $266.85 | $44.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +79.5% | +96.3% | +94.7% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 60.2 | 60.8 | 65.0 | 71.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 253K | 5.5M | 12.7M | 7.0M | 31.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KBDC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KBDC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for BAC (target: $61) vs -0.2% for KBDC (target: $14). For income investors, KBDC offers the higher dividend yield at 12.51% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $19.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 32 | 48 | 61 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +12.5% | +2.1% | +2.5% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 56 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $0.38 | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% | +5.1% |
KBDC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
KBDC vs ARCC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.
0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +120. 7%, compared to +7. 5% for Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus KBDC's +7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 101% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -35. 7% for Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
3% net margin versus 15. 9% for Bank of America Corporation — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KBDC leads at 72. 8% versus 19. 7% for BAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KBDC leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAC: 9. 4% to $61. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) offers the highest yield at 12. 5%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is KBDC or ARCC or KO or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, JPM: +475. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KBDC and ARCC and KO and JPM and BAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (KBDC (Financial Services) and ARCC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.