Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KBR vs BAH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
KBR vs BAH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $4.21B | $13.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.69B | $11.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $401M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.12B | $4.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $500M | $885M |
KBR vs BAH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KBR, Inc. (KBR) | 100 | 141.6 | +41.6% |
| Booz Allen Hamilton… (BAH) | 100 | 96.3 | -3.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBR vs BAH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 12.7x)
BAH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 58.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 227.8% 10Y total return vs KBR's 163.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs KBR's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs KBR's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs KBR's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs KBR's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.8% vs KBR's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs KBR's 6.0%, ROIC 24.3% vs 10.4% |
KBR vs BAH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KBR vs BAH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAH and KBR operate at a comparable scale, with $11.4B and $7.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.3% (BAH) to 5.2% (KBR). On growth, KBR holds the edge at -6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.7B | $11.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $837M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $401M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $491M | $933M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KBR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, KBR trades at a 2% valuation discount to BAH's 10.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KBR's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAH's 10.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $16.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.34x | 10.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.71x | 12.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.27x | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 9.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.73x | 14.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KBR and BAH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAH delivers a 81.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $82 in annual profit, vs $26 for KBR. KBR carries lower financial leverage with a 2.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAH's 4.21x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | +81.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +24.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 4.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $500M | $885M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.53x | 5.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAH five years ago would be worth $10,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,740 for KBR. Over the past 12 months, BAH leads with a -35.8% total return vs KBR's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAH at -3.1% vs KBR's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.6% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.8% | -35.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.9% | -9.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.6% | +2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.2% | +227.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.6% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAH is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KBR's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.78 | $130.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.03 | $73.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.5% | +58.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
BAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KBR as "Buy" and BAH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 55.6% upside for KBR (target: $52) vs 26.5% for BAH (target: $97). For income investors, BAH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs KBR's 1.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.67 | $97.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +6.2% |
BAH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KBR vs BAH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBR or BAH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for KBR, Inc. (KBR). KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KBR, Inc. (KBR) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KBR or BAH?
On trailing P/E, KBR, Inc.
(KBR) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, KBR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KBR or BAH?
Over the past 5 years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) delivered a total return of +2.
7%, compared to -12. 6% for KBR, Inc. (KBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAH returned +227. 8% versus KBR's +163. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KBR or BAH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus KBR, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning KBR is approximately 138% more volatile than BAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KBR, Inc. (KBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KBR or BAH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus 0. 6% for KBR, Inc. (KBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation grew EPS 58. 0% year-over-year, compared to 14. 6% for KBR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAH leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KBR or BAH?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus 5. 3% for KBR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAH leads at 11. 4% versus 7. 3% for KBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAH leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KBR or BAH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KBR, Inc.
(KBR) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBR: 55. 6% to $51. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KBR or BAH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 0% for KBR, Inc. (KBR).
09Is KBR or BAH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 2. 7% yield, +227. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAH: +227. 8%, KBR: +163. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KBR and BAH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.