Steel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Banks - Regional
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $56M | $228.85B | $65.68B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $34.66B | $12.46B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $7.13B | $2.11B | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 46.0% | 32.0% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | 28.8% | 18.4% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x | 22.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $26.99B | $18.41B | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $5.06B | $1.86B | $763M |
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FST Corp. (KBSX) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 101.7 | +1.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBSX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- 31.4% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
LIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs APD's 166.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- PEG 1.09 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.24 vs FFIN's 0.95
APD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +14.2% vs KBSX's -36.4%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.5x)
- 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.2% vs KBSX's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs KBSX's -3.8%, ROIC 11.3% vs -7.2% |
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
LIN leads 2 • APD leads 1 • KBSX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 672.7x KBSX's $52M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KBSX's -4.5%. On growth, KBSX holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $34.7B | $12.5B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $510,674 | $12.1B | $3.9B | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $7.1B | $2.1B | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $5.1B | $1.1B | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +46.0% | +32.0% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +28.8% | +18.4% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +20.6% | +16.9% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +14.7% | +8.9% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.0% | +8.2% | +8.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +164.1% | +13.4% | +141.1% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, FFIN trades at a 39% valuation discount to LIN's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.33x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $228.8B | $65.7B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $250.8B | $82.2B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.75x | 33.85x | -166.67x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x | 22.46x | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x | 119.66x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 6.73x | 5.46x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.84x | 5.82x | 3.79x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | — | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-19 for KBSX. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KBSX's 3.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +17.8% | +11.9% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +8.3% | +5.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.2% | +11.3% | -2.0% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +13.0% | -2.4% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.73x | 0.68x | 1.06x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $21.9B | $16.6B | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $5.1B | $1.9B | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $27.0B | $18.4B | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.69x | 34.52x | 12.00x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,049 for KBSX. Over the past 12 months, APD leads with a +14.2% total return vs KBSX's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 11.8% vs KBSX's -52.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | +15.5% | +19.2% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.4% | +11.2% | +14.2% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +39.7% | +7.0% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +73.9% | +13.2% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +375.2% | +166.4% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.8% | +11.8% | +2.3% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs KBSX's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.24x | 0.45x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.52 | $521.28 | $307.29 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $387.78 | $229.11 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.2% | +94.7% | +96.0% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 2.3M | 1.2M | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", APD as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 6.0% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs LIN's 1.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $539.71 | $312.78 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 42 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.4% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 | 29 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $7.11 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LIN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
KBSX vs LIN vs APD vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Linde plc at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Linde plc wins at 1. 09x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to -89. 5% for FST Corp. (KBSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus KBSX's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 297% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 4% for FST Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FST Corp. grew EPS 66. 0% year-over-year, compared to -110. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -14. 8% for FST Corp. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -7. 3% for APD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Linde plc (LIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Linde plc — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN?
In this comparison, APD (2.
4% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KBSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KBSX or LIN or APD or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, KBSX: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KBSX and LIN and APD and FFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KBSX (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and APD (Basic Materials) and FFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KBSX is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; APD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. LIN, APD, FFIN pay a dividend while KBSX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.