Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KD vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
KD vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.85B | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.09B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $198M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.62B | $10.61B |
KD vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyndryl Holdings, I… (KD) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 827.1 | +727.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KD vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.42
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42
- Beta 1.42
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs KD's -69.0%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs KD's 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs KD's 0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 25.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs KD's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.42 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs KD's -61.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs KD's 2.3% |
KD vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KD vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 14.3x KD's $15.1B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KD's 1.3%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.1B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $198M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
KD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, KD trades at a 66% valuation discount to NVDA's 43.2x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.87x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.33x | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.01x | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $20 for KD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVDA scores 4/9 vs KD's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.8% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,102 for KD. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs KD's -61.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs KD's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.4% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.9% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KD and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KD is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs KD's 28.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.20 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KD as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.6% upside for KD (target: $20) vs 31.8% for NVDA (target: $279).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.67 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KD vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KD or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KD or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
(KD) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KD or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -69.
0% for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus KD's -69. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KD or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
(KD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 22% more volatile than KD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — KD or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 0. 2% for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KD or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 1. 3% for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 3. 1% for KD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KD or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
(KD) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 6x for NVIDIA Corporation — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KD: 55. 6% to $19. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KD or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KD or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
(KD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KD: -69. 0%, NVDA: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KD and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.