KEN vs AMTD vs ITRN vs ESLT vs TEVA

For growth investors, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.

3x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. at 64. 5x. On forward P/E, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is actually cheaper at 14. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 58x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) delivered a total return of +486. 3%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1257% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Ituran Location and Control Ltd. 's 1. 18β — meaning ITRN is approximately 1761% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 356. 6% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESLT leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.

4% net margin versus 6. 7% for Elbit Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEVA leads at 51. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Elbit Systems Ltd. — 42. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEVA: 8. 3% to $39. 00.

In this comparison, AMTD (36.

7% yield), KEN (4. 4% yield), ITRN (3. 2% yield), ESLT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TEVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 4% yield, +1257% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEN: +1257%, TEVA: -28. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and AMTD (Financial Services) and ITRN (Technology) and ESLT (Industrials) and TEVA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ESLT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TEVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KEN, AMTD, ITRN pay a dividend while ESLT, TEVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.