KEN vs ICL

For growth investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus ICL Group Ltd at 33. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) delivered a total return of +240. 6%, compared to +12. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1257% versus ICL's +98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICL Group Ltd (ICL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Kenon Holdings Ltd. 's 0. 90β — meaning KEN is approximately 37% more volatile than ICL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 48% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 356. 6% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, KEN leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 6% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 79. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICL leads at 9. 8% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICL leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 9% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 4% yield, +1257% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEN: +1257%, ICL: +98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and ICL (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.