KEN vs AMTD

For growth investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.

2x versus Kenon Holdings Ltd. at 8. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) delivered a total return of +258. 4%, compared to -97. 6% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1257% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Kenon Holdings Ltd. 's 0. 90β — meaning KEN is approximately 1316% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 48% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 356. 6% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.

4% net margin versus 79. 6% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMTD leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the highest yield at 38. 2%, versus 4. 1% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 1% yield, +1257% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEN: +1257%, AMTD: -91. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and AMTD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.