Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Business Equipment & Supplies
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $105M | $163M | $97M | $295M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $288M | $651M | $237M | $458M | $3.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-28M | $14M | $22M | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | 28.9% | 37.5% | 42.6% | 23.2% | 39.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | -2.0% | 7.7% | 6.1% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | 14.7x | 8.7x | 11.9x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $244M | $42M | $59M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $4M | $27M | $40M | $209M |
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kewaunee Scientific… (KEQU) | 100 | 382.0 | +282.0% |
| Lifetime Brands, In… (LCUT) | 100 | 126.4 | +26.4% |
| Virco Mfg. Corporat… (VIRC) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KEQU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -40.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 138.9% 10Y total return vs VIRC's 73.3%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs LCUT's -5.1%
LCUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +123.7% vs VIRC's -23.8%
VIRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.3%, current ratio 2.98x
- PEG 0.16 vs HNI's 3.40
- Beta 0.86, yield 1.4%, current ratio 2.98x
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 7.5% ROA vs LCUT's -4.9%, ROIC 9.9% vs 4.1%
HNI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.7% yield, vs VIRC's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs LCUT's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs LCUT's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs LCUT's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs VIRC's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs VIRC's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LCUT's -4.9%, ROIC 9.9% vs 4.1% |
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VIRC leads in 1 of 6 categories
KEQU leads 0 • LCUT leads 0 • FLXS leads 0 • HNI leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 15.1x VIRC's $237M. VIRC is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCUT's -4.2%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $288M | $651M | $237M | $458M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $3M | $24M | $31M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$28M | $14M | $22M | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $18M | $2M | $28M | $8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +37.5% | +42.6% | +23.2% | +39.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | -2.0% | +7.7% | +6.1% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -4.2% | +5.7% | +4.8% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +2.8% | +0.9% | +6.1% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +2.4% | -15.1% | +9.8% | +124.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.9% | -15.8% | -37.5% | -27.2% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LCUT and VIRC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, VIRC trades at a 85% valuation discount to HNI's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VIRC offers better value at 0.09x vs HNI's 12.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $163M | $97M | $295M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $402M | $112M | $314M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.52x | -5.80x | 4.67x | 15.54x | 31.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.84x | 14.67x | 8.69x | 11.90x | 8.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.09x | — | 12.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.21x | 8.62x | 3.34x | 10.38x | 9.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.25x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 0.77x | 0.92x | 1.87x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.29x | 50.06x | 3.62x | 8.74x | 8.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KEQU delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-14 for LCUT. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCUT's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LCUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | -14.3% | +11.8% | +12.2% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -4.9% | +6.8% | +7.5% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.3% | +4.1% | +18.8% | +9.9% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +5.4% | +21.0% | +12.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 1.20x | 0.38x | 0.35x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | $239M | $15M | $19M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $4M | $27M | $40M | $209M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $244M | $42M | $59M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.64x | -1.01x | 32.34x | 380.21x | 2.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KEQU and LCUT and FLXS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEQU five years ago would be worth $30,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,118 for LCUT. Over the past 12 months, LCUT leads with a +123.7% total return vs VIRC's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs HNI's 12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +87.0% | -1.7% | +38.7% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +123.7% | -23.8% | +80.1% | -17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.0% | +52.5% | +72.2% | +242.4% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | -48.8% | +97.1% | +19.5% | -7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.9% | -49.0% | +73.3% | +51.4% | +9.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +15.1% | +19.9% | +50.7% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCUT's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs KEQU's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.56x | 0.86x | 1.51x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $60.89 | $8.20 | $9.36 | $59.95 | $53.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.78 | $2.89 | $5.16 | $29.38 | $31.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +87.7% | +65.9% | +92.0% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 42.0 | 49.5 | 60.4 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 264K | 38K | 47K | 743K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS and HNI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LCUT as "Hold", VIRC as "Buy", HNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.8% upside for HNI (target: $95) vs -30.5% for LCUT (target: $5). For income investors, HNI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.72% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | — | $54.00 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.17 | $0.09 | $0.63 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +1.0% | +4.9% |
VIRC leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 5 categories are tied.
KEQU vs LCUT vs VIRC vs FLXS vs HNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) is the stronger pick with 18.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
On trailing P/E, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus HNI Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, HNI Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Virco Mfg. Corporation wins at 0. 16x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
Over the past 5 years, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) delivered a total return of +202.
7%, compared to -48. 8% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEQU returned +138. 9% versus LCUT's -49. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Lifetime Brands, Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning LCUT is approximately 82% more volatile than VIRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 120% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) is pulling ahead at 18.
0% versus -5. 1% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIRC leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -4. 2% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIRC leads at 10. 5% versus 3. 8% for LCUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIRC leads at 43. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HNI Corporation (HNI) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 23. 8x for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNI: 173. 8% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI?
In this comparison, HNI (3.
7% yield), LCUT (2. 4% yield), VIRC (1. 4% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. KEQU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KEQU or LCUT or VIRC or FLXS or HNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 4% yield). Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIRC: +73. 3%, LCUT: -49. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KEQU and LCUT and VIRC and FLXS and HNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (KEQU (Consumer Cyclical) and LCUT (Consumer Cyclical) and VIRC (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and HNI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KEQU is a small-cap high-growth stock; LCUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIRC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LCUT, VIRC, FLXS, HNI pay a dividend while KEQU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.