Insurance - Reinsurance
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
Consulting Services
Consulting Services
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Reinsurance | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Consulting Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $86M | $790M | $2.02B | $1.35B | $4.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $1.33B | $1.74B | $1.82B | $3.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-102M | $35M | $104M | $85M | $267M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 27.2% | 23.3% | 27.2% | 31.8% |
| Operating Margin | -326.4% | 3.8% | 11.3% | 7.9% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x | 14.2x | 10.6x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $255M | $70M | $548M | $571M | $590M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2M | $25M | $5M | $265M |
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kestrel Group, Ltd. (KG) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| ICF International, … (ICFI) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) | 100 | 134.4 | +34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 294.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +18.9% vs KG's -59.4%
HURN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
ICFI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.92 vs FCN's 2.23
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.23
FCN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 294.4% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 34.0%, current ratio 1.56x
- 6.9% margin vs KG's -370.5%
- Beta 0.09 vs KG's 1.21, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 294.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.23 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs KG's -370.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs KG's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs KG's -59.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KG's -9.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 0.0% |
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICFI leads 1 • HURN leads 1 • KG leads 0 • FCN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HURN and FCN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 141.1x KG's $27M. FCN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KG's -3.7%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $1.3B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | $56M | $231M | $201M | $445M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$102M | $35M | $104M | $85M | $267M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$72M | $43M | $124M | $151M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +27.2% | +23.3% | +27.2% | +31.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +3.8% | +11.3% | +7.9% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +2.6% | +6.0% | +4.7% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +3.3% | +7.1% | +8.3% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.1% | +14.2% | -10.3% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.2% | +0.8% | -22.2% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ICFI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, ICFI trades at a 32% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICFI offers better value at 1.31x vs FCN's 2.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $86M | $790M | $2.0B | $1.3B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $337M | $858M | $2.5B | $1.9B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.28x | 22.05x | 21.37x | 15.05x | 19.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.96x | 14.18x | 10.60x | 17.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.31x | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2379.44x | 15.42x | 10.99x | 9.13x | 11.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.44x | 0.59x | 1.19x | 0.72x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 6.17x | 4.25x | 1.33x | 3.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.88x | 11.06x | 11.22x | 31.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-71 for KG. FCN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KG's 5.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KG scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -70.8% | +27.2% | +21.8% | +8.3% | +15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.0% | +9.2% | +6.8% | +4.1% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +19.1% | +15.0% | +7.2% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +20.1% | +18.6% | +9.3% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.65x | 0.56x | 1.04x | 0.56x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $251M | $68M | $524M | $566M | $324M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2M | $25M | $5M | $265M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $255M | $70M | $548M | $571M | $590M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.27x | — | 7.70x | 6.75x | 28.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,890 for KG. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs KG's -59.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs KG's -26.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +39.2% | -27.1% | -12.5% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.4% | +18.9% | -17.2% | -11.0% | -2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.4% | -13.8% | +62.5% | -32.1% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.1% | -16.8% | +120.2% | -16.9% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.1% | +195.5% | +116.8% | +100.5% | +294.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.0% | -4.8% | +17.6% | -12.1% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KFRC and FCN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCN is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KG's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs KG's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.53x | 0.82x | 0.52x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.20 | $47.48 | $186.78 | $101.71 | $189.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.07 | $24.49 | $112.45 | $64.52 | $149.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.8% | +91.0% | +66.8% | +73.2% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 65.6 | 37.4 | 59.8 | 28.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 305K | 243K | 349K | 426K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", ICFI as "Buy", FCN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 2.6% for FCN (target: $166). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs ICFI's 0.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $200.00 | $102.50 | $166.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 9 | 13 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | — | $0.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +6.4% | +8.2% | +4.1% | +17.6% |
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). ICFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KG vs KFRC vs HURN vs ICFI vs FCN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kestrel Group, Ltd.
(KG) is the stronger pick with 294. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
On trailing P/E, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ICF International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICF International, Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus FTI Consulting, Inc. 's 2. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -51. 1% for Kestrel Group, Ltd. (KG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCN returned +294. 4% versus KG's -24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FTI Consulting, Inc.
(FCN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Kestrel Group, Ltd. 's 1. 21β — meaning KG is approximately 1250% more volatile than FCN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 6% for Kestrel Group, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kestrel Group, Ltd.
(KG) is pulling ahead at 294. 7% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTI Consulting, Inc. grew EPS 5. 5% year-over-year, compared to -72. 1% for Kestrel Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
FTI Consulting, Inc.
(FCN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 2. 7% for KG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KG leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus FTI Consulting, Inc. 's 2. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), ICFI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. KG, HURN, FCN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KG or KFRC or HURN or ICFI or FCN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, KG: -24. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KG and KFRC and HURN and ICFI and FCN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KG (Financial Services) and KFRC (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and ICFI (Industrials) and FCN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KG is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC, ICFI pay a dividend while KG, HURN, FCN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.