KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$1.00
5Y Perf.-73.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOOG
Alphabet Inc.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$4.78T
5Y Perf.+145.7%
KIDZW vs GOOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KIDZW | GOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $4.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $30.71B |
KIDZW vs GOOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KIDZW
GOOG
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOG leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, KIDZW is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
GOOG
Alphabet Inc.
The Income Pick
GOOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOG | 15.1% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | GOOG | 37.9% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% |
| Stability / Safety | GOOG | Beta 1.23 vs KIDZW's 2.64 |
| Dividends | GOOG | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOG | +159.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOG | 27.4% ROA vs KIDZW's -8.7% |
KIDZW vs GOOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
KIDZW vs GOOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOOGLAGGINGKIDZW
KIDZWClassover Holdings, I…
1leads
GOOGAlphabet Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KIDZWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GOOG4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KIDZW1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOOG4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GOOG2/2
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GOOG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 114204.7x KIDZW's $4M. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, KIDZW holds the edge at +31.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +81.9% |
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $4.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $4.81T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 36.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 11.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.27x |
KIDZW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-36 for KIDZW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOG scores 7/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | 392.15x |
GOOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +159.3% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | +159.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +266.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +231.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +1013.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +54.2% |
GOOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOG is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOG currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $397.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $149.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 82.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 19.1M |
GOOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GOOG is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $383.41 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GOOG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KIDZW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KIDZW vs GOOG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) offers the better valuation at 36. 6x trailing P/E (32. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — KIDZW or GOOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants's 2. 64β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 115% more volatile than GOOG relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOOG?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOG leads at 32. 1% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOG leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOOG?
In this comparison, GOOG (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is KIDZW or GOOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), +1013% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOOG (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOG is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KIDZW: 31.5% · GOOG: 21.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare GOOG vs META
META is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GOOG.
Closest Rival
Compare KIDZW vs GOTU
GOTU is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KIDZW.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With MSFT + AMZN
MSFT and AMZN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.