Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KIDZW logo
KIDZW
GOTU logo
GOTU
COE logo
COE
DUOL logo
DUOL
CHGG logo
CHGG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21K
5Y Perf.-99.5%
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$551M
5Y Perf.-13.1%
COE
51Talk Online Education Group

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.+262.2%
DUOL
Duolingo, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.71B
5Y Perf.+42.1%
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$124M
5Y Perf.-96.5%

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KIDZW logoKIDZW
GOTU logoGOTU
COE logoCOE
DUOL logoDUOL
CHGG logoCHGG
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$21K$551M$2M$5.71B$124M
Revenue (TTM)$3M$6.15B$96M$1.10B$319M
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-323M$-16M$422M$-86M
Gross Margin57.8%67.4%74.0%72.7%61.9%
Operating Margin-136.5%-8.2%-14.0%14.2%-11.1%
Forward P/E355.8x43.3x
Total Debt$9M$586M$3M$94M$84M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$712M$39M$1.04B$31M

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KIDZW
GOTU
COE
DUOL
CHGG
StockFeb 22Jun 26Return
KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW)1000.5-99.5%
Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU)10086.9-13.1%
51Talk Online Educa… (COE)100362.2+262.2%
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL)100142.1+42.1%
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG)1003.5-96.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DUOL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. 51Talk Online Education Group is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CHGG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇DUOL emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI
The Consumer Defensive Pick

KIDZW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GOTU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
The Income Pick

COE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76
  • 89.1% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0%
  • Beta 0.76 vs CHGG's 2.81
Best for: income & stability
DUOL
Duolingo, Inc.
The Growth Play

DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
  • -11.8% 10Y total return vs COE's -76.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
  • Beta 0.88, current ratio 2.61x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CHGG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • -24.5% vs KIDZW's -99.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOE logoCOE89.1% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0%
ValueDUOL logoDUOLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDUOL logoDUOL38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
Stability / SafetyCOE logoCOEBeta 0.76 vs CHGG's 2.81
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CHGG logoCHGG-24.5% vs KIDZW's -99.2%
Efficiency (ROA)DUOL logoDUOL22.6% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 40.8% vs -57.7%

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI

Segment breakdown not available.

GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
FY 2025
Learning Services
99.5%$6.0B
Other Revenue
0.5%$31M
COE51Talk Online Education Group
FY 2025
One Operating Segment
100.0%$96M
DUOLDuolingo, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
87.6%$873M
Advertising
8.0%$80M
English Test
4.2%$42M
Product And Service, Other Miscellaneous
0.2%$2M
CHGGChegg, Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription Services
100.0%$549M

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDUOLLAGGINGCOE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 2002.5x KIDZW's $3M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, COE holds the edge at +89.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$6.1B$96M$1.1B$319M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$327M-$15M$167M$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$323M-$16M$422M-$86M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$247M$10M$423M-$25M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.8%+67.4%+74.0%+72.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-136.5%-8.2%-14.0%+14.2%-11.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%-5.3%-16.5%+38.4%-26.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-136.0%+4.0%+9.9%+38.5%-8.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.4%+21.4%+89.4%+26.5%-47.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.4%+36.1%-2.9%+29.2%+101.2%
DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 31.8x.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$21,143$551M$2M$5.7B$124M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$533M-$34M$4.8B$177M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-12.24x-0.12x14.31x-1.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.355.83x43.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple31.82x11.57x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x0.61x0.02x5.51x0.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x3.01x4.40x1.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.12x0.21x15.45x
KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZW's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs DUOL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.8%-20.8%+33.6%-62.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.2%-5.8%-27.5%+22.6%-26.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.7%-33.8%+40.8%-13.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-61.4%-22.2%+7.9%-26.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.50x0.47x0.07x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M-$127M-$36M-$943M$53M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$712M$39M$1.0B$31M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$586M$3M$94M$84M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.06x-525.53x
DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DUOL five years ago would be worth $8,822 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a -24.5% total return vs KIDZW's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 45.8% vs KIDZW's -72.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.2%-37.7%-35.6%-30.5%+13.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.2%-61.9%-26.5%-74.5%-24.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.9%-54.2%+210.0%-22.3%-89.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-90.6%-51.1%-11.8%-98.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-85.5%-76.3%-11.8%-77.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-72.4%-22.9%+45.8%-8.1%-53.3%
Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

COE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHGG currently trades 58.4% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.66x0.98x0.76x0.88x2.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.48$4.12$56.13$489.00$1.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.01$1.40$15.32$87.89$0.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.6%+36.9%+35.9%+25.1%+58.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10031.430.737.466.248.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7K396K8K1.7M2.0M
Evenly matched — COE and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CHGG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", COE as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2640.5% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 11.0% for DUOL (target: $136).

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.COE logoCOE51Talk Online Edu…DUOL logoDUOLDuolingo, Inc.CHGG logoCHGGChegg, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.94$136.17$30.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts1022222
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CHGG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KIDZW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallDuolingo, Inc. (DUOL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 89.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (43. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

On forward P/E, Duolingo, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 43. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

Over the past 5 years, Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) delivered a total return of -11. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUOL returned -11. 8% versus KIDZW's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

76β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning CHGG is approximately 269% more volatile than COE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 89.

1% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 85. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Duolingo, Inc.

(DUOL) trades at 43. 3x forward P/E versus 355. 8x for 51Talk Online Education Group — 312. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2640. 5% to $30. 42.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

76)). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COE: -76. 3%, KIDZW: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and COE and DUOL and CHGG?

These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology) and DUOL (Technology) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.