Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Software - Application
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $21K | $551M | $2M | $5.71B | $124M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $6.15B | $96M | $1.10B | $319M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-323M | $-16M | $422M | $-86M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 67.4% | 74.0% | 72.7% | 61.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% | 14.2% | -11.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 355.8x | 43.3x | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $586M | $3M | $94M | $84M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $712M | $39M | $1.04B | $31M | $10.27B |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 362.2 | +262.2% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 142.1 | +42.1% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 132.7 | +32.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 6 stocks, GOTU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76
- 89.1% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0%
- Beta 0.76 vs CHGG's 2.81
DUOL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 2.61x
- 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
CHGG doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs DUOL's -11.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
- +17.2% vs KIDZW's -99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.1% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs CHGG's 2.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs KIDZW's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 40.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
KIDZW leads 1 • GOTU leads 0 • COE leads 0 • DUOL leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 16055.5x KIDZW's $3M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, COE holds the edge at +89.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $6.1B | $96M | $1.1B | $319M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$327M | -$15M | $167M | $11M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$323M | -$16M | $422M | -$86M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $247M | $10M | $423M | -$25M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +67.4% | +74.0% | +72.7% | +61.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% | +14.2% | -11.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.3% | -16.5% | +38.4% | -26.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +4.0% | +9.9% | +38.5% | -8.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +21.4% | +89.4% | +26.5% | -47.9% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +36.1% | -2.9% | +29.2% | +101.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, DUOL trades at a 47% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 31.8x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21,143 | $551M | $2M | $5.7B | $124M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $533M | -$34M | $4.8B | $177M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -12.24x | -0.12x | 14.31x | -1.16x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 355.83x | 43.26x | — | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 31.82x | 11.57x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.61x | 0.02x | 5.51x | 0.33x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.01x | — | 4.40x | 1.00x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.12x | 0.21x | 15.45x | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DUOL and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZW's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs DUOL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -20.8% | — | +33.6% | -62.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -5.8% | -27.5% | +22.6% | -26.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -33.8% | — | +40.8% | -13.4% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -22.2% | — | +7.9% | -26.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.47x | — | 0.07x | 0.70x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$127M | -$36M | -$943M | $53M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $712M | $39M | $1.0B | $31M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $586M | $3M | $94M | $84M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | — | — | — | -525.53x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs KIDZW's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 45.8% vs KIDZW's -72.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -37.7% | -35.6% | -30.5% | +13.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -61.9% | -26.5% | -74.5% | -24.5% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -54.2% | +210.0% | -22.3% | -89.8% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -90.6% | -51.1% | -11.8% | -98.6% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -85.5% | -76.3% | -11.8% | -77.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.4% | -22.9% | +45.8% | -8.1% | -53.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.98x | 0.76x | 0.88x | 2.81x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $4.12 | $56.13 | $489.00 | $1.90 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.40 | $15.32 | $87.89 | $0.53 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +36.9% | +35.9% | +25.1% | +58.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.4 | 30.7 | 37.4 | 66.2 | 48.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 396K | 8K | 1.7M | 2.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", COE as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2640.5% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | — | $136.17 | $30.42 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 22 | 22 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). KIDZW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs DUOL vs CHGG vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 89.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (43. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
On trailing P/E, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -99. 5% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus KIDZW's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning CHGG is approximately -1505% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 89.
1% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 85. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.
3x forward P/E versus 355. 8x for 51Talk Online Education Group — 330. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2640. 5% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, GOTU, COE, DUOL, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or DUOL or CHGG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, KIDZW: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and COE and DUOL and CHGG and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology) and DUOL (Technology) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while KIDZW, GOTU, COE, DUOL, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.