Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KIDZW logo
KIDZW
NUVL logo
NUVL
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
GOTU logo
GOTU
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15K
5Y Perf.-99.7%
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.08B
5Y Perf.+725.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$892.31B
5Y Perf.+125.2%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$421.65B
5Y Perf.+26.4%
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$540M
5Y Perf.-14.9%

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KIDZW logoKIDZW
NUVL logoNUVL
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
GOTU logoGOTU
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$15K$9.08B$892.31B$421.65B$540M
Revenue (TTM)$3M$0.00$280.33B$191.57B$6.15B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-450M$57.05B$30.51B$-323M
Gross Margin57.8%60.0%56.1%67.4%
Operating Margin-136.5%25.9%19.7%-8.2%
Forward P/E14.3x12.5x
Total Debt$9M$0.00$942.38B$365.90B$586M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$262M$343.34B$231.84B$712M

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KIDZW
NUVL
JPM
BAC
GOTU
StockFeb 22Jun 26Return
KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW)1000.3-99.7%
Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL)100825.2+725.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100225.2+125.2%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100126.4+26.4%
Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU)10085.1-14.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Nuvalent, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. BAC and GOTU also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI
The Consumer Defensive Pick

Among these 5 stocks, KIDZW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NUVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
  • +61.6% vs KIDZW's -99.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.

  • PEG 0.81 vs BAC's 0.82
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 20.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency and bank quality
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 0.42x
  • Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
  • Beta 0.86 vs KIDZW's 2.66, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
The Growth Play

GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 35.0%, EPS growth 69.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.0%
  • 35.0% revenue growth vs NUVL's -29.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGOTU logoGOTU35.0% revenue growth vs NUVL's -29.8%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
Stability / SafetyBAC logoBACBeta 0.86 vs KIDZW's 2.66, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NUVL logoNUVL+61.6% vs KIDZW's -99.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -57.7%

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI

Segment breakdown not available.

NUVLNuvalent, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
FY 2025
Learning Services
99.5%$6.0B
Other Revenue
0.5%$31M

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNUVLLAGGINGGOTU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JPM and GOTU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$0$280.3B$191.6B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$346M$81.4B$40.0B-$327M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$450M$57.0B$30.5B-$323M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$313M$100.9B$12.6B$247M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.8%+60.0%+56.1%+67.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-136.5%+25.9%+19.7%-8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%+20.4%+15.9%-5.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-136.0%+36.0%+6.6%+4.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.4%+21.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.4%-17.8%+16.0%+18.3%+36.1%
Evenly matched — JPM and GOTU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KIDZW and JPM and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.6x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 8% valuation discount to JPM's 15.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BAC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
Market CapShares × price$14,616$9.1B$892.3B$421.6B$540M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$8.8B$1.49T$555.7B$522M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-21.09x15.93x14.63x-11.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.34x12.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.32x13.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x3.19x2.20x0.59x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x7.18x2.46x1.39x2.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.85x33.43x14.81x
Evenly matched — KIDZW and JPM and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. GOTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.8%-42.8%+15.9%+10.1%-20.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.2%-37.8%+1.3%+0.9%-5.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.7%-32.5%+4.5%+3.5%-33.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-61.4%-34.4%+8.9%+4.5%-22.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–941575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.50x2.60x1.21x0.47x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M-$262M$599.0B$134.1B-$127M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$262M$343.3B$231.8B$712M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$0$942.4B$365.9B$586M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.06x-36.13x0.74x0.48x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NUVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $65,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +61.6% total return vs KIDZW's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 40.3% vs KIDZW's -77.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.2%+22.3%-0.9%+0.9%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.4%+61.6%+20.3%+28.3%-61.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.9%+176.1%+133.8%+100.9%-59.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+558.0%+120.7%+46.7%-90.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+558.0%+475.6%+376.2%-85.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-77.5%+40.3%+32.7%+26.2%-26.0%
NUVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NUVL and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.66x0.87x0.94x0.86x0.98x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.00$123.62$337.25$57.55$4.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.01$71.13$266.85$44.06$1.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.5%+99.8%+94.7%+97.1%+36.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10032.266.765.071.735.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7K2.0M7.0M31.6M390K
Evenly matched — NUVL and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NUVL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 97.3% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.27% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricKIDZW logoKIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$132.74$339.75$61.13$2.94
# AnalystsCovering analysts17615410
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015120
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+5.1%+9.4%
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallNuvalent, Inc. (NUVL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM vs BAC vs GOTU: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.

(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 35. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

6x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.

(NUVL) delivered a total return of +558. 0%, compared to -99. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +558. 0% versus KIDZW's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

86β versus KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI's 2. 66β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 208% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.

(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 35. 0% versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gaotu Techedu Inc. grew EPS 69. 6% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOTU leads at 35. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 97. 3% to $2. 94.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU?

In this comparison, BAC (2.

3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. KIDZW, NUVL, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM or BAC or GOTU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

86), 2. 3% yield, +376. 2% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +376. 2%, KIDZW: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KIDZW and NUVL and JPM and BAC and GOTU?

These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and NUVL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock. JPM, BAC pay a dividend while KIDZW, NUVL, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.