KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$1.00
5Y Perf.-73.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+33.9%
KIDZW vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KIDZW | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $10.73B |
KIDZW vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KIDZW
WMT
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WMT leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, KIDZW is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | WMT | 3.3% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.12 vs KIDZW's 2.64 |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +32.7% vs KIDZW's -92.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs KIDZW's -8.7% |
KIDZW vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
KIDZW vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWMTLAGGINGKIDZW
KIDZWClassover Holdings, I…
1leads
WMTWalmart Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KIDZWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WMT3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KIDZW1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMT4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT2/2
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WMT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 190012.6x KIDZW's $4M. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, KIDZW holds the edge at +31.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% |
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x |
KIDZW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-36 for KIDZW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | 11.85x |
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +37.6% |
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 17.2M |
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KIDZW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallWalmart Inc. (WMT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KIDZW vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 7x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — KIDZW or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants's 2. 64β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 2160% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — KIDZW or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KIDZW leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is KIDZW or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KIDZW and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while KIDZW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KIDZW: 31.5% · WMT: 5.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.