Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KLC vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
KLC vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $463M | $143M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-113M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.60B | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $31M |
KLC vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KinderCare Learning… (KLC) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 80.0 | -20.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLC vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.02
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth 1.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.02, current ratio 0.74x
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -70.8% 10Y total return vs KLC's -85.0%
- +79.3% vs KLC's -70.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.6% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.1% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.02 vs CHGG's 2.97 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs KLC's -70.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC -0.6% vs -13.4% |
KLC vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KLC vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 8.6x CHGG's $319M. KLC is the more profitable business, keeping -4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, KLC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $104M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$113M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.2% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KLC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLC's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $463M | $143M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $196M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.12x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.86x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.60x | 12.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.19x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KLC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLC delivers a -12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. CHGG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KLC's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs KLC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KLC and CHGG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KLC five years ago would be worth $1,498 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs KLC's -70.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KLC at -46.9% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.2% | +79.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.0% | -87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.0% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.0% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.9% | -49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLC and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLC is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHGG currently trades 67.4% from its 52-week high vs KLC's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.88 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.75 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.0 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KLC as "Hold" and CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs -10.6% for KLC (target: $4).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KLC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
KLC vs CHGG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLC or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.
(KLC) is the stronger pick with 2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Analysts rate KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. (KLC) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KLC or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.
(KLC) delivered a total return of -85. 0%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHGG returned -70. 8% versus KLC's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KLC or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.
(KLC) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 47% more volatile than KLC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 2% for KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KLC or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.
(KLC) is pulling ahead at 2. 6% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chegg, Inc. grew EPS 88. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KLC leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KLC or CHGG?
KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.
(KLC) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 1% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KLC leads at -0. 7% versus -16. 8% for CHGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHGG leads at 60. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KLC or CHGG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276.
6% to $30. 42.
07Which pays a better dividend — KLC or CHGG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KLC or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chegg, Inc.
(CHGG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. (KLC) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHGG: -70. 8%, KLC: -85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KLC and CHGG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.