Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KLTO logo
KLTO
PRAX logo
PRAX
LGND logo
LGND
CRL logo
CRL
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KLTO
Klotho Neurosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-59.1%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.+533.6%
LGND
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.12B
5Y Perf.+87.4%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-9.7%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.-28.9%

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KLTO logoKLTO
PRAX logoPRAX
LGND logoLGND
CRL logoCRL
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$7M$7.70B$5.12B$9.03B$30.79B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$274M$4.03B$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-327M$154M$-185M$1.39B
Gross Margin98.6%31.9%26.1%
Operating Margin36.7%11.8%13.9%
Forward P/E28.2x16.9x14.2x
Total Debt$272K$110K$451M$3.07B$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$64K$357M$175M$214M$1.98B

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KLTO
PRAX
LGND
CRL
IQV
StockAug 24Mar 26Return
Klotho Neuroscience… (KLTO)10040.9-59.1%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100633.6+533.6%
Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND)100187.4+87.4%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10090.3-9.7%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)10071.1-28.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LGND leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. IQV also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇LGND emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KLTO
Klotho Neurosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

KLTO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +491.9% vs KLTO's -81.0%
Best for: momentum
LGND
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
The Growth Play

LGND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 60.4%, EPS growth 28.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
  • 126.0% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 44.4%, current ratio 22.23x
  • Beta 1.03, current ratio 22.23x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

IQV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLGND logoLGND60.4% revenue growth vs KLTO's -49.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsLGND logoLGND55.9% margin vs KLTO's -14.5%
Stability / SafetyLGND logoLGNDBeta 1.03 vs KLTO's 1.91
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs KLTO's -81.0%
Efficiency (ROA)LGND logoLGND11.1% ROA vs KLTO's -112.1%, ROIC 3.4% vs -242.3%

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KLTOKlotho Neurosciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
FY 2025
Royalty
32.5%$161M
Intangible Royalty Assets
26.8%$133M
Contract Revenue
13.5%$67M
Material Sales, Captisol, Core
8.1%$40M
Royalty, Kyprolis
7.2%$36M
Financial Royalty Assets
5.8%$28M
Royalty, Other
2.1%$10M
Other (3)
4.0%$20M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLGNDLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 55.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +14.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$274M$4.0B$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M-$357M$127M$824M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$327M$154M-$185M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M-$283M$123M$391M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.6%+31.9%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.7%+11.8%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+55.9%-4.6%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+44.8%+9.7%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.1%+1.2%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.9%+2.7%+69.7%-160.0%+15.0%
LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CRL and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.1x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 44% valuation discount to LGND's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 66.7x.

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$7M$7.7B$5.1B$9.0B$30.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M$7.3B$5.4B$11.9B$45.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.19x-19.77x41.69x-64.44x23.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.21x16.90x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple66.66x13.04x13.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue19.10x2.25x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.19x6.83x5.10x2.89x4.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF104.71x17.42x15.01x
Evenly matched — CRL and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PRAX and LGND and IQV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-114 for KLTO. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGND scores 5/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-113.7%-43.0%+16.2%-5.7%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-112.1%-40.2%+11.1%-2.5%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.4%-65.0%+3.4%+6.3%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.2%-49.3%+3.9%+8.1%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.00x0.44x0.95x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$208,012-$357M$277M$2.9B$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63,741$357M$175M$214M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$271,753$110,000$451M$3.1B$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.98x197.45x4.29x3.10x
Evenly matched — PRAX and LGND and IQV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $20,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,699 for KLTO. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs KLTO's -81.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs KLTO's -28.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.1%-6.9%+34.4%-7.4%-19.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-81.0%+491.9%+123.3%+23.5%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%+1757.4%+245.1%-8.7%-14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%-14.2%+107.7%-47.2%-25.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%-36.1%+126.0%+122.4%+177.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.2%+164.8%+51.1%-3.0%-5.0%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LGND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LGND is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLTO's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGND currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs KLTO's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.91x1.55x1.03x1.39x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.45$366.52$259.03$228.88$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.21$37.19$110.00$143.06$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+15.6%+72.7%+98.7%+81.9%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.931.972.860.854.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded95K396K204K767K1.5M
LGND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 3.8% for LGND (target: $265).

MetricKLTO logoKLTOKlotho Neuroscien…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$607.15$265.33$213.17$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts16173744
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%0.0%+0.3%+4.0%+4.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LGND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallLigand Pharmaceuticals Inco… (LGND)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KLTO vs PRAX vs LGND vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger pick with 60.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +107.

7%, compared to -63. 0% for Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +177. 5% versus KLTO's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

03β versus Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning KLTO is approximately 85% more volatile than LGND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is pulling ahead at 60.

4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 28. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGND leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the more profitable company, earning 46.

4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 46. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGND leads at 17. 6% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGND leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KLTO or PRAX or LGND or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

03), +126. 0% 10Y return). Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGND: +126. 0%, KLTO: -63. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KLTO and PRAX and LGND and CRL and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLTO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.