Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $207M | $225M | $364.95B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $181M | $103M | $59.05B | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $11M | $11.08B | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 91.4% | 64.4% | 77.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 13.2% | 23.0% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 55.8x | 16.4x | 22.2x | 65.4x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $7M | $29.64B | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $25M | $9.47B | $325M |
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR) | 100 | 11.8 | -88.2% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 166.4 | +66.4% |
| Vimeo, Inc. (VMEO) | 100 | 17.4 | -82.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLTR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 65.4x)
CSCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 0.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 301.7% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs VMEO's -0.0%
- 18.8% margin vs VMEO's 1.0%
VMEO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +67.7% vs KLTR's -36.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs VMEO's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 65.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs VMEO's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs KLTR's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.7% vs KLTR's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs VMEO's 0.7%, ROIC 13.0% vs 16.5% |
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPOK leads 1 • KLTR leads 0 • VMEO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 571.0x SPOK's $103M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VMEO's 1.0%. On growth, CSCO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $181M | $103M | $59.1B | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $17M | $16.1B | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $11M | $11.1B | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $26M | $12.8B | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +91.4% | +64.4% | +77.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +13.2% | +23.0% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.3% | +18.8% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +24.7% | +21.8% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | -100.0% | +9.7% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -64.0% | +29.5% | -105.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 71% valuation discount to VMEO's 49.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VMEO's 40.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $207M | $225M | $365.0B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $226M | $206M | $385.1B | $926M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.74x | 14.44x | 36.14x | 49.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.78x | 16.41x | 22.18x | 65.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.91x | 26.34x | 40.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 1.61x | 6.44x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 33.81x | 1.56x | 7.87x | 3.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.90x | 8.91x | 27.46x | 21.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLTR delivers a 75.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $1 for VMEO. VMEO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KLTR's 7.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs SPOK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +75.8% | +7.3% | +23.2% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +5.2% | +9.0% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.9% | +11.3% | +13.0% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.2% | +12.1% | +13.7% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.32x | 0.05x | 0.63x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | -$18M | $20.2B | -$314M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $25M | $9.5B | $325M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $7M | $29.6B | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.23x | — | 9.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CSCO and VMEO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,167 for KLTR. Over the past 12 months, VMEO leads with a +67.7% total return vs KLTR's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VMEO at 30.2% vs KLTR's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | -14.3% | +22.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.4% | -26.7% | +57.5% | +67.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +13.4% | +109.3% | +120.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.3% | +61.9% | +87.2% | -86.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.3% | +13.3% | +301.7% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.3% | +4.3% | +27.9% | +30.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPOK and VMEO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLTR's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VMEO currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.42x | 0.92x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.33 | $19.31 | $94.72 | $7.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.05 | $9.96 | $59.07 | $3.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.1% | +56.1% | +97.3% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 36.7 | 63.9 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 580K | 185K | 18.9M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPOK and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KLTR as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", CSCO as "Buy", VMEO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 185.7% upside for KLTR (target: $4) vs 4.7% for CSCO (target: $97). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.95% vs CSCO's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $15.00 | $96.50 | $12.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 1 | 73 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.9% | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.29 | $1.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.7% | +1.3% | +2.0% | +2.1% |
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPOK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
KLTR vs SPOK vs CSCO vs VMEO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Vimeo, Inc. (VMEO). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Vimeo, Inc. at 49. 1x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -88. 3% for Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +301. 7% versus KLTR's -88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Kaltura, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning KLTR is approximately 175% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vimeo, Inc. (VMEO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 7% for Kaltura, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -0. 0% for Vimeo, Inc. (VMEO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaltura, Inc. grew EPS 137. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 6. 4% for Vimeo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -4. 3% for KLTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for Vimeo, Inc. — 49. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLTR: 185. 7% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. KLTR, VMEO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KLTR or SPOK or CSCO or VMEO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, KLTR: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KLTR and SPOK and CSCO and VMEO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KLTR (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and CSCO (Technology) and VMEO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KLTR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; VMEO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK, CSCO pay a dividend while KLTR, VMEO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.