Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KMTS vs LIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
KMTS vs LIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $3.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-145M | $107M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | -171.5% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $238M | $636M |
KMTS vs LIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KESTRA MEDICAL TECH… (KMTS) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| LivaNova PLC (LIVN) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KMTS vs LIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KMTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 115.1%, EPS growth -151.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 6.72x
- 115.1% revenue growth vs LIVN's 10.7%
LIVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.29
- 46.2% 10Y total return vs KMTS's -1.5%
- Beta 1.29, current ratio 1.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 115.1% revenue growth vs LIVN's 10.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs KMTS's -173.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs KMTS's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs KMTS's -1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs KMTS's -48.8%, ROIC 11.5% vs -6.6% |
KMTS vs LIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KMTS vs LIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 17.1x KMTS's $84M. LIVN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMTS's -173.0%. On growth, KMTS holds the edge at +62.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$142M | $220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$145M | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | $161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -171.5% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -173.0% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -143.3% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.7% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.0% | +106.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LIVN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.19x | -15.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.99x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.19x | 3.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVN delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-69 for KMTS. KMTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVN's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMTS scores 6/9 vs LIVN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.8% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.8% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.6% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$193M | -$162M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $238M | $636M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.93x | 3.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KMTS five years ago would be worth $9,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,546 for LIVN. Over the past 12 months, LIVN leads with a +63.0% total return vs KMTS's -1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIVN at 14.6% vs KMTS's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.8% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.5% | +63.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -14.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +46.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.5% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LIVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIVN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMTS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIVN currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs KMTS's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $71.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.25 | $39.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.7% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 357K | 808K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KMTS as "Buy" and LIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for KMTS (target: $28) vs 7.0% for LIVN (target: $76). KMTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $75.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LIVN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
KMTS vs LIVN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KMTS or LIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
(KMTS) is the stronger pick with 115. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for LivaNova PLC (LIVN). Analysts rate KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. (KMTS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KMTS or LIVN?
Over the past 5 years, KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
(KMTS) delivered a total return of -1. 5%, compared to -14. 5% for LivaNova PLC (LIVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIVN returned +46. 2% versus KMTS's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KMTS or LIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
29β versus KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. 's 1. 87β — meaning KMTS is approximately 45% more volatile than LIVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. (KMTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 39% for LivaNova PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KMTS or LIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
(KMTS) is pulling ahead at 115. 1% versus 10. 7% for LivaNova PLC (LIVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. grew EPS -151. 5% year-over-year, compared to -483. 6% for LivaNova PLC. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KMTS or LIVN?
LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is the more profitable company, earning -17.
5% net margin versus -190. 3% for KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. — meaning it keeps -17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIVN leads at 14. 4% versus -177. 8% for KMTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIVN leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KMTS or LIVN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMTS: 30.
1% to $28. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KMTS or LIVN?
In this comparison, KMTS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LIVN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KMTS or LIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
29)). KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. (KMTS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVN: +46. 2%, KMTS: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KMTS and LIVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KMTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.