Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KNOP vs TEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KNOP
KNOT Offshore Partners LP

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$377M
5Y Perf.-26.9%
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • GR
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.+229.6%

KNOP vs TEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KNOP logoKNOP
TEN logoTEN
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$377M$1.33B
Revenue (TTM)$359M$779M
Net Income (TTM)$53M$110M
Gross Margin40.3%33.4%
Operating Margin30.9%27.0%
Forward P/E7.6x6.6x
Total Debt$906M$1.76B
Cash & Equiv.$67M$348M

KNOP vs TENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KNOP
TEN
StockMay 20May 26Return
KNOT Offshore Partn… (KNOP)10073.1-26.9%
Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN)100329.6+229.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KNOP vs TEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TEN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. KNOT Offshore Partners LP is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KNOP
KNOT Offshore Partners LP
The Growth Play

KNOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 120.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
  • 7.5% revenue growth vs TEN's -9.6%
  • 14.7% margin vs TEN's 14.1%
Best for: growth exposure
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick

TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 5.5%
  • 77.4% 10Y total return vs KNOP's 45.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 1.10x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKNOP logoKNOP7.5% revenue growth vs TEN's -9.6%
ValueTEN logoTENLower P/E (6.6x vs 7.6x)
Quality / MarginsKNOP logoKNOP14.7% margin vs TEN's 14.1%
Stability / SafetyTEN logoTENBeta 0.33 vs KNOP's 0.36, lower leverage
DividendsTEN logoTEN5.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KNOP's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)TEN logoTEN+163.4% vs KNOP's +69.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KNOP logoKNOP3.2% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 3.7% vs 6.9%

KNOP vs TEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KNOPKNOT Offshore Partners LP
FY 2024
Time Charter And Bareboat Revenues
50.0%$307M
Time Charter Revenues
49.2%$302M
Bareboat Revenues
0.8%$5M
TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited
FY 2021
Clean Air Division
67.7%$8.1B
Ride Performance Division
24.2%$2.9B
Powertrain
6.3%$755M
Motorparts
1.9%$223M

KNOP vs TEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGKNOP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KNOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

TEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $779M annually — 2.2x KNOP's $359M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.7% (KNOP) to 14.1% (TEN). On growth, KNOP holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$359M$779M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$225M$327M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$53M$110M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$155M-$503M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.3%+33.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.9%+27.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.7%+14.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+43.2%-64.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.0%-9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.0%-71.6%
KNOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 83% valuation discount to KNOP's 52.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KNOP's 6.6x.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
Market CapShares × price$377M$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS52.79x8.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.57x6.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.12x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.62x6.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.21x1.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.62x0.73x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.77x
TEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KNOP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KNOP delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for TEN. TEN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNOP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KNOP scores 8/9 vs TEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.5%+6.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.2%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.7%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.48x1.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$839M$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$67M$348M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$906M$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.79x2.06x
KNOP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $51,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,507 for KNOP. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +163.4% total return vs KNOP's +69.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.9% vs KNOP's 37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.7%+103.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+69.1%+163.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+158.4%+191.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.9%+415.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.1%+77.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+37.2%+42.9%
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNOP's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEN currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs KNOP's 96.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.36x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.55$44.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.16$17.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.0%+99.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.668.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded119K499K
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates KNOP as "Buy" and TEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for KNOP (target: $16) vs 13.6% for TEN (target: $50). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.53% vs KNOP's 2.74%.

MetricKNOP logoKNOPKNOT Offshore Par…TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00$50.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1226
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+5.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.30$2.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KNOP leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KNOP vs TEN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KNOP or TEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KNOP or TEN?

On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.

7x versus KNOT Offshore Partners LP at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KNOP or TEN?

Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +415.

4%, compared to -24. 9% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEN returned +77. 4% versus KNOP's +45. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KNOP or TEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus KNOT Offshore Partners LP's 0. 36β — meaning KNOP is approximately 7% more volatile than TEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 148% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KNOP or TEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -9. 6% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KNOT Offshore Partners LP grew EPS 120. 4% year-over-year, compared to -44. 4% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KNOP or TEN?

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

9% net margin versus 4. 5% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 34. 6% versus 23. 3% for KNOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNOP leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KNOP or TEN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 6.

6x forward P/E versus 7. 6x for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNOP: 44. 3% to $16. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KNOP or TEN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 7% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP).

09

Is KNOP or TEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

33), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEN: +77. 4%, KNOP: +45. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KNOP and TEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (KNOP (Industrials) and TEN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KNOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

KNOP

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TEN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KNOP and TEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KNOP: 27.0% · TEN: -9.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(KNOP: 14.7% · TEN: 14.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KNOP: 52.8x · TEN: 8.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.