KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.33B
5Y Perf.+602.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KNTK vs AM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$10.09B
5Y Perf.+344.4%
KNTK vs AM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KNTK | AM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.33B | $10.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.73B | $1.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $228M | $411M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 64.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 57.6% |
| Forward P/E | 42.4x | 19.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $3.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $180M |
KNTK vs AM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KNTK
AM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 702.3 | +602.3% |
| Antero Midstream Co… (AM) | 100 | 444.4 | +344.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNTK vs AM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Kinetik Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
KNTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 16.5%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs AM's 7.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
AM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -13.8% 10Y total return vs KNTK's -33.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 3.41x
- Beta 0.19, yield 4.3%, current ratio 3.41x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KNTK | 19.0% revenue growth vs AM's 7.0% |
| Value | AM | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 42.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | AM | 31.9% margin vs KNTK's 13.2% |
| Stability / Safety | AM | Beta 0.19 vs KNTK's 0.60 |
| Dividends | KNTK | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AM's 4.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KNTK | +28.0% vs AM's +24.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AM | 6.9% ROA vs KNTK's 4.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs 1.9% |
KNTK vs AM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
KNTK vs AM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMLAGGINGKNTK
KNTKKinetik Holdings Inc.
2leads
AMAntero Midstream Corp…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KNTKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AM6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KNTK4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KNTK2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNTK and AM operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. AM is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KNTK's 13.2%. On growth, AM holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $534M | $951M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $228M | $411M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | $916M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +64.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +57.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +71.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +8.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | 0.0% |
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KNTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, KNTK trades at a 25% valuation discount to AM's 24.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KNTK's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AM's 15.5x.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $10.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.43x | 24.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.44x | 19.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.14x | 15.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 8.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 5.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.78x | 13.10x |
KNTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNTK delivers a 21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $20 for AM. KNTK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AM's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AM scores 8/9 vs KNTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.1% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.98x | 4.07x |
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AM five years ago would be worth $27,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,312 for KNTK. Over the past 12 months, KNTK leads with a +28.0% total return vs AM's +24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AM at 32.2% vs KNTK's 24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.9% | +131.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.1% | +177.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | -13.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +32.2% |
AM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KNTK and AM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AM is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs AM's 89.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.11 | $23.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.33 | $16.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 40.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.5M |
Evenly matched — KNTK and AM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KNTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KNTK as "Buy" and AM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.2% upside for AM (target: $22) vs -1.8% for KNTK (target: $48). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs AM's 4.29%.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | AMAntero Midstream … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.57 | $21.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.98 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +1.3% |
KNTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KNTK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallAntero Midstream Corporation (AM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KNTK vs AM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNTK or AM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (42. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNTK or AM?
On trailing P/E, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the cheapest at 18. 4x versus Antero Midstream Corporation at 24. 7x. On forward P/E, Antero Midstream Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNTK or AM?
Over the past 5 years, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) delivered a total return of +177.
4%, compared to +93. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AM returned -13. 8% versus KNTK's -33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNTK or AM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning KNTK is approximately 222% more volatile than AM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 163% for Antero Midstream Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNTK or AM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 7. 0% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Antero Midstream Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNTK or AM?
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
8% net margin versus 10. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AM leads at 51. 2% versus 9. 3% for KNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AM leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNTK or AM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) trades at 19.
2x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AM: 1. 2% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNTK or AM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 4. 3% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM).
09Is KNTK or AM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AM: -13. 8%, KNTK: -33. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNTK and AM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KNTK: -7.5% · AM: 8.6%)Net Margin>
%
(KNTK: 13.2% · AM: 31.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KNTK: 18.4x · AM: 24.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.