Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.33B | $54.26B | $17.67B | $8.05B | $81.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.73B | $16.38B | $4.05B | $1.62B | $52.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $228M | $2.13B | $1.21B | $353M | $5.80B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 22.1% | 68.8% | 75.0% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 21.1% | 40.6% | 62.2% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 41.9x | 24.5x | 13.6x | 12.8x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $17.55B | $8.93B | $3.77B | $34.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $166M | $819M | $2M | $1.25B |
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 689.0 | +589.0% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1386.9 | +1286.9% |
| Western Midstream P… (WES) | 100 | 465.6 | +365.6% |
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 196.5 | +96.5% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 194.7 | +94.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNTK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
- 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
TRGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs HESM's 121.2%
- +61.6% vs HESM's +10.9%
WES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.66 vs EPD's 1.40
- Beta 0.28, yield 8.2%, current ratio 1.34x
- 29.9% margin vs EPD's 11.0%
- 8.9% ROA vs KNTK's 4.2%, ROIC 10.5% vs 1.9%
HESM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.40
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.9% margin vs EPD's 11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs HESM's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs KNTK's 4.2%, ROIC 10.5% vs 1.9% |
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HESM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRGP leads 1 • KNTK leads 0 • WES leads 0 • EPD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WES and HESM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPD is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.6B annually — 32.5x HESM's $1.6B. WES is the more profitable business, keeping 29.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPD's 11.0%. On growth, WES holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $16.4B | $4.0B | $1.6B | $52.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $534M | $5.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $228M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $353M | $5.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $585M | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +22.1% | +68.8% | +75.0% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +21.1% | +40.6% | +62.2% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +13.0% | +29.9% | +21.8% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +7.1% | +33.6% | +36.1% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -15.6% | +22.5% | +2.3% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -100.0% | +10.1% | +5.9% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HESM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, HESM trades at a 54% valuation discount to TRGP's 29.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WES offers better value at 0.70x vs EPD's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $54.3B | $17.7B | $8.0B | $81.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $71.6B | $25.8B | $11.8B | $115.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.43x | 29.63x | 14.43x | 13.50x | 14.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.95x | 24.46x | 13.63x | 12.83x | 12.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.70x | 0.80x | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.14x | 14.44x | 11.22x | 9.67x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 3.17x | 4.60x | 4.96x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 16.97x | 4.19x | 10.85x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.78x | 92.90x | 12.06x | 11.05x | 27.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM delivers a 74.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $19 for EPD. EPD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRGP scores 6/9 vs KNTK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.1% | +70.8% | +33.5% | +74.9% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +8.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +13.2% | +10.5% | +18.6% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +16.7% | +12.6% | +24.8% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 5.49x | 2.14x | 8.61x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $17.4B | $8.1B | $3.8B | $33.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $166M | $819M | $2M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $17.5B | $8.9B | $3.8B | $34.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.98x | 6.52x | 6.44x | 4.54x | 5.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,312 for KNTK. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs HESM's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs HESM's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +36.4% | +13.6% | +13.6% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +61.6% | +30.6% | +10.9% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.9% | +268.0% | +107.8% | +62.9% | +73.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.1% | +592.2% | +170.5% | +123.1% | +105.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +618.0% | +72.1% | +121.2% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +54.4% | +27.6% | +17.7% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WES and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WES currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs HESM's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.23x | 0.24x | 0.22x | -0.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.11 | $261.95 | $44.74 | $44.14 | $39.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.33 | $144.14 | $35.51 | $31.63 | $29.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +96.4% | +96.8% | +87.5% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 54.1 | 47.7 | 49.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.3M | 1.4M | 1.6M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KNTK as "Buy", TRGP as "Buy", WES as "Hold", HESM as "Hold", EPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.4% upside for KNTK (target: $49) vs -17.1% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.67 | $246.50 | $42.33 | $32.00 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 33 | 13 | 9 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | +1.5% | +8.2% | +7.4% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.98 | $3.81 | $3.56 | $2.84 | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +5.0% | +0.4% |
HESM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TRGP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
KNTK vs TRGP vs WES vs HESM vs EPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Hess Midstream LP (HESM) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
On trailing P/E, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the cheapest at 13.
5x versus Targa Resources Corp. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, Hess Midstream LP is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Western Midstream Partners, LP wins at 0. 66x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +93. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +606. 8% versus KNTK's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning KNTK is approximately -12660% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Western Midstream Partners, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
4% net margin versus 10. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus 9. 3% for KNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WES leads at 68. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNTK: 0. 4% to $48. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is KNTK or TRGP or WES or HESM or EPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 1. 5% yield, +606. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +606. 8%, KNTK: -34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNTK and TRGP and WES and HESM and EPD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WES is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.