KODK vs AMGN

For growth investors, Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK). Amgen Inc. (AMGN) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amgen Inc. (AMGN) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) delivered a total return of +111.

2%, compared to +48. 7% for Amgen Inc. (AMGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMGN returned +161. 5% versus KODK's +21. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Eastman Kodak Company's 1. 68β — meaning KODK is approximately 180% more volatile than AMGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 2. 5% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amgen Inc. grew EPS 88. 2% year-over-year, compared to -297. 8% for Eastman Kodak Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMGN leads at 11. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus -12. 0% for Eastman Kodak Company — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMGN leads at 29. 1% versus 2. 3% for KODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMGN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Amgen Inc. (AMGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 2% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 2. 9% yield, +161. 5% 10Y return). Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMGN: +161. 5%, KODK: +21. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KODK (Industrials) and AMGN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

AMGN pays a dividend while KODK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.