KODK vs NNBR

For growth investors, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is the stronger pick with 2.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Analysts rate NN, Inc. (NNBR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) delivered a total return of +94.

4%, compared to -63. 4% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KODK returned +20. 7% versus NNBR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

68β versus NN, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NNBR is approximately 21% more volatile than KODK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 144% for NN, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is pulling ahead at 2.

5% versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NN, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -297. 8% for Eastman Kodak Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, KODK leads at -3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NN, Inc.

(NNBR) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 1% net margin versus -12. 0% for Eastman Kodak Company — meaning it keeps -8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KODK leads at 2. 3% versus -4. 3% for NNBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KODK leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, KODK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NNBR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KODK: +20. 7%, NNBR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.