Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $42.35B | $1.04T | $58.67B | $8.29B | $7.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147.64B | $703.06B | $106.25B | $81.72B | $8.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $22.91B | $4.04B | $870M | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 27.2% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 1.8% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 44.9x | 16.1x | 7.1x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $24.68B | $67.09B | $5.59B | $14.18B | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.33B | $10.73B | $5.49B | $298M | $257M |
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 197.7 | +97.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 327.5 | +227.5% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Albertsons Companie… (ACI) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 307.7 | +207.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, KR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs SFM's 209.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.5%
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.94x
- 3.5% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +41.8% vs SFM's -54.4%
ACI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.46 vs WMT's 4.08
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.83
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
- 5.7% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- 12.5% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs SFM's -54.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0% |
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACI leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • KR leads 0 • TGT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 79.0x SFM's $8.9B. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147.6B | $703.1B | $106.2B | $81.7B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.5B | $42.8B | $8.7B | $4.1B | $996M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $22.9B | $4.0B | $870M | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.5B | $15.3B | $2.9B | $2.1B | $361M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +27.2% | +37.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +1.8% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +1.1% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +2.5% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +1.9% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +35.1% | +23.7% | -20.3% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ACI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACI trades at a 79% valuation discount to WMT's 47.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACI offers better value at 0.64x vs WMT's 4.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.4B | $1.04T | $58.7B | $8.3B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $63.7B | $1.10T | $58.8B | $22.2B | $9.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.45x | 47.91x | 15.84x | 9.84x | 14.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.78x | 44.91x | 16.10x | 7.10x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x | — | 0.64x | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.96x | 24.96x | 7.42x | 5.48x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.46x | 0.56x | 0.10x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.38x | 10.50x | 3.63x | 2.78x | 5.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.64x | 25.08x | 20.69x | 11.06x | 15.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACI's 4.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs SFM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +22.3% | +26.1% | +34.8% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +7.9% | +6.9% | +3.2% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +6.8% | +17.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +7.1% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.16x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 4.19x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.3B | $56.4B | $104M | $13.9B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.3B | $10.7B | $5.5B | $298M | $257M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.7B | $67.1B | $5.6B | $14.2B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | 11.85x | 12.40x | 3.41x | 254.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $30,441 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,047 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +41.8% total return vs SFM's -54.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 38.1% vs ACI's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +16.2% | +29.3% | -5.0% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.3% | +32.6% | +41.8% | -22.8% | -54.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | +163.3% | -9.0% | -14.6% | +116.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.7% | +187.7% | -29.5% | +37.3% | +204.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.6% | +517.6% | +107.8% | +67.4% | +209.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +38.1% | -3.1% | -5.1% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.64x | 0.12x | 0.95x | -0.33x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.58 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $22.78 | $182.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.60 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $15.80 | $64.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +97.1% | +96.8% | +70.8% | +43.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 57.1 | 56.7 | 40.9 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 17.5M | 4.6M | 6.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", ACI as "Buy", SFM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for ACI (target: $20) vs -10.5% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.75 | $137.04 | $115.31 | $19.63 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 64 | 59 | 23 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +0.7% | +3.5% | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 37 | 22 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $0.94 | $4.51 | $0.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +6.4% |
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KR vs WMT vs TGT vs ACI vs SFM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
On trailing P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc.
(ACI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Albertsons Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +204. 4%, compared to -29. 5% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +517. 6% versus ACI's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Target Corporation's 0. 95β — meaning TGT is approximately -249% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 4% for Albertsons Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACI: 21. 7% to $19. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
5% yield), ACI (3. 1% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SFM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KR or WMT or TGT or ACI or SFM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +115. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +115. 6%, TGT: +107. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KR and WMT and TGT and ACI and SFM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock. KR, WMT, TGT, ACI pay a dividend while SFM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.