Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KRMD
KORU Medical Systems, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+99.1%
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$55.53B
5Y Perf.+11.3%
BAX
Baxter International Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.04B
5Y Perf.-67.5%
ICU
SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$29M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.97B
5Y Perf.+17.2%

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KRMD logoKRMD
BDX logoBDX
BAX logoBAX
ICU logoICU
HOLX logoHOLX
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesBiotechnologyMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$207M$55.53B$9.04B$29M$16.97B
Revenue (TTM)$43M$21.36B$11.32B$881K$4.13B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$1.14B$-1.10B$-14M$544M
Gross Margin60.1%46.5%30.1%95.3%52.8%
Operating Margin-5.1%10.6%-2.7%-15.8%17.5%
Forward P/E12.3x9.2x17.2x
Total Debt$3M$19.18B$10.00B$574K$2.63B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$851M$1.97B$2M$1.96B

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KRMD
BDX
BAX
ICU
HOLX
StockSep 22May 26Return
KORU Medical System… (KRMD)100199.1+99.1%
Becton, Dickinson a… (BDX)100111.3+11.3%
Baxter Internationa… (BAX)10032.5-67.5%
SeaStar Medical Hol… (ICU)1001.9-98.1%
Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)100117.2+17.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. BDX and BAX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KRMD
KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

KRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth 56.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • 11.2% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
The Income Pick

BDX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.7%
  • 2.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BAX's 3.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
The Value Play

BAX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
ICU
SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation
The Growth Leader

ICU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 12.0% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
  • +291.9% vs BAX's -41.8%
Best for: growth and momentum
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
  • Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
  • 13.2% margin vs ICU's -15.5%
  • Beta 0.41 vs BAX's 1.37, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICU logoICU12.0% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
ValueBAX logoBAXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHOLX logoHOLX13.2% margin vs ICU's -15.5%
Stability / SafetyHOLX logoHOLXBeta 0.41 vs BAX's 1.37, lower leverage
DividendsBDX logoBDX2.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BAX's 3.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICU logoICU+291.9% vs BAX's -41.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HOLX logoHOLX6.1% ROA vs ICU's -88.0%

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KRMDKORU Medical Systems, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BDXBecton, Dickinson and Company
FY 2025
Medical
52.5%$11.5B
Interventional
23.9%$5.2B
Life Sciences
23.7%$5.2B
BAXBaxter International Inc.
FY 2025
Medical Products And Therapies
48.8%$5.3B
Healthcare Systems and Technologies
28.3%$3.1B
Pharmaceuticals
22.9%$2.5B
ICUSeaStar Medical Holding Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

HOLXHologic, Inc.
FY 2025
Diagnostics
44.6%$1.8B
Breast Health
36.2%$1.5B
Gyn Surgical
16.6%$680M
Skeletal Health
2.7%$109M

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHOLXLAGGINGICU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ICU and HOLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.4B annually — 24250.9x ICU's $881,000. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICU's -15.5%. On growth, ICU holds the edge at +169.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$43M$21.4B$11.3B$881,000$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$4.2B$671M-$14M$974M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M$1.1B-$1.1B-$14M$544M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$179,290$3.1B$501M-$14M$1000M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.1%+46.5%+30.1%+95.3%+52.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.1%+10.6%-2.7%-15.8%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.3%+5.3%-9.7%-15.5%+13.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.4%+14.7%+4.4%-16.1%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.1%-10.6%+2.9%+169.1%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.3%-2.0%-112.0%+88.2%-9.2%
Evenly matched — ICU and HOLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.3x trailing earnings, BDX trades at a 14% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BDX's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAX's 25.4x.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$207M$55.5B$9.0B$29M$17.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$201M$73.9B$17.1B$28M$17.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-77.76x26.29x-10.01x-0.73x30.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.27x9.17x17.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.65x25.37x17.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.02x2.54x0.80x215.18x4.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.03x1.73x1.47x3.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.80x27.99x18.44x
BAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HOLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HOLX delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-119 for ICU. KRMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAX's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDX scores 7/9 vs BAX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.6%+4.5%-16.5%-119.2%+11.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.3%+2.1%-5.4%-88.0%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-19.5%+4.3%-1.4%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.9%+5.4%-1.7%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.76x1.64x0.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$18.3B$8.0B-$1M$667M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$851M$2.0B$2M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$19.2B$10.0B$574,000$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.09x-0.83x-209.88x8.00x
HOLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRMD five years ago would be worth $12,402 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $189 for ICU. Over the past 12 months, ICU leads with a +291.9% total return vs BAX's -41.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRMD at 4.2% vs ICU's -53.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.9%+0.7%-10.2%+84.7%+1.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+63.2%+51.8%-41.8%+291.9%+37.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.3%+5.0%-56.3%-90.1%-8.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.0%+16.9%-74.3%-98.1%+15.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1116.4%+80.2%-42.4%-98.1%+124.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.2%+1.6%-24.1%-53.7%-2.9%
KRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAX's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BAX's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.15x0.66x1.37x1.06x0.41x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.61$205.52$32.68$5.08$76.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.63$100.31$15.73$0.22$52.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.2%+74.6%+53.6%+95.6%+100.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.932.244.065.769.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded138K2.5M8.7M150K10.0M
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BDX and BAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KRMD as "Buy", BDX as "Buy", BAX as "Hold", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.7% upside for KRMD (target: $7) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). For income investors, BAX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.87% vs BDX's 2.72%.

MetricKRMD logoKRMDKORU Medical Syst…BDX logoBDXBecton, Dickinson…BAX logoBAXBaxter Internatio…ICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$172.85$19.75$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts5333642
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.17$0.68
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.8%0.0%0.0%+4.4%
Evenly matched — BDX and BAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHologic, Inc. (HOLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KRMD vs BDX vs BAX vs ICU vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.

(KRMD) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORU Medical Systems, Inc. (KRMD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

On trailing P/E, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the cheapest at 26.

3x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Baxter International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

Over the past 5 years, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.

(KRMD) delivered a total return of +24. 0%, compared to -98. 1% for SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation (ICU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRMD returned +1116% versus ICU's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Baxter International Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning BAX is approximately 234% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KORU Medical Systems, Inc. (KRMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 164% for Baxter International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), KORU Medical Systems, Inc.

(KRMD) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation grew EPS 78. 1% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Baxter International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRMD leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -183. 9% for SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOLX leads at 17. 4% versus -132. 2% for ICU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICU leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Baxter International Inc.

(BAX) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRMD: 57. 7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX?

In this comparison, BAX (3.

9% yield), BDX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. KRMD, ICU, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KRMD or BDX or BAX or ICU or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BDX: +80. 2%, ICU: -98. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KRMD and BDX and BAX and ICU and HOLX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KRMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; BDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ICU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BDX, BAX pay a dividend while KRMD, ICU, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KRMD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BDX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 84%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KRMD and BDX and BAX and ICU and HOLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KRMD: 22.1% · BDX: -10.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.