Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $749M | $20.25B | $22.48B | $707M | $350M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $4.07B | $3.24B | $551M | $387M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $327M | $265M | $-104M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 45.2% | 43.2% | 43.6% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | -16.3% | 14.8% | 29.1% | -11.7% | -24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 64.1x | 30.4x | 41.4x | 69.8x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $4.69B | $3.89B | $27M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $675M | $360M | $95M | $96M |
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT) | 100 | 34.7 | -65.3% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 49.7 | -50.3% |
| 3D Systems Corporat… (DDD) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 14.18x
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 14.18x
- Beta 1.49 vs DDD's 3.12, lower leverage
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1%
- 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ENTG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
Among these 5 stocks, SSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DDD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 69.8x)
- 16.7% margin vs SSYS's -18.9%
- 11.5% ROA vs SSYS's -9.6%, ROIC -28.8% vs -5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 69.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs SSYS's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs DDD's 3.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs SSYS's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SSYS's -9.6%, ROIC -28.8% vs -5.8% |
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
KRNT leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • SSYS leads 0 • DDD leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG and DDD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 19.6x KRNT's $208M. DDD is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSYS's -18.9%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $4.1B | $3.2B | $551M | $387M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $945M | $1.3B | -$32M | -$78M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $327M | $265M | -$104M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $401M | $721M | -$8M | -$98M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +45.2% | +43.2% | +43.6% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +14.8% | +29.1% | -11.7% | -24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +8.0% | +8.2% | -18.9% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.8% | +22.3% | -1.4% | -25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +15.2% | +5.0% | -6.9% | -4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.8% | +53.2% | +46.3% | +62.7% | +116.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, DDD trades at a 87% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MKSI's 26.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $749M | $20.2B | $22.5B | $707M | $350M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $732M | $24.3B | $26.0B | $639M | $315M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.30x | 68.83x | 95.26x | -6.41x | 12.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.13x | 30.36x | 41.38x | 69.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.70x | 19.81x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 5.15x | 7.03x | 1.28x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 7.49x | 5.68x | 0.79x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 235.87x | 40.74x | 56.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KRNT and DDD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDD delivers a 30.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SSYS. KRNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNT scores 6/9 vs DDD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.9% | +12.2% | +6.7% | -12.3% | +30.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +3.7% | +3.1% | -9.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +6.5% | +9.3% | -5.8% | -28.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +7.2% | +11.7% | -6.6% | -22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.73x | 0.98x | 0.03x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | $4.0B | $3.5B | -$68M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $675M | $360M | $95M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $4.7B | $3.9B | $27M | $61M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.84x | 2.47x | — | 51.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKSI five years ago would be worth $16,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,247 for DDD. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs SSYS's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs DDD's -35.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +78.8% | +65.1% | -9.0% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | +306.1% | +88.9% | -15.6% | +22.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | +266.0% | +87.4% | -42.9% | -73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | +66.5% | +30.4% | -59.1% | -87.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.2% | +750.6% | +1040.3% | -60.6% | -81.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +54.1% | +23.3% | -17.0% | -35.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRNT and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDD's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENTG currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs DDD's 63.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 2.64x | 2.66x | 1.79x | 3.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.48 | $326.83 | $159.15 | $12.81 | $3.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.93 | $71.49 | $66.32 | $7.34 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.4% | +92.0% | +92.8% | +64.0% | +63.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 65.3 | 63.8 | 64.8 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 271K | 1.2M | 2.4M | 818K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", SSYS as "Buy", DDD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 108.8% upside for DDD (target: $5) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $272.86 | $152.00 | $13.50 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 29 | 26 | 36 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.87 | $0.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
KRNT vs MKSI vs ENTG vs SSYS vs DDD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
On trailing P/E, 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the cheapest at 12.
6x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
Over the past 5 years, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) delivered a total return of +66. 5%, compared to -87. 5% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus DDD's -81. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kornit Digital Ltd.
(KRNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus 3D Systems Corporation's 3. 12β — meaning DDD is approximately 113% more volatile than KRNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 3D Systems Corporation grew EPS 109. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Entegris, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKSI leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
7% net margin versus -18. 9% for Stratasys Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -24. 8% for DDD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSYS leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 69. 8x for Stratasys Ltd. — 39. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DDD: 108. 8% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. KRNT, SSYS, DDD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KRNT or MKSI or ENTG or SSYS or DDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, DDD: -81. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRNT and MKSI and ENTG and SSYS and DDD?
These companies operate in different sectors (KRNT (Industrials) and MKSI (Technology) and ENTG (Technology) and SSYS (Technology) and DDD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DDD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.