Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+111.7%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.53B
5Y Perf.+207.3%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-40.2%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.57B
5Y Perf.+347.3%
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$28.19B
5Y Perf.+319.6%

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KRP logoKRP
NOG logoNOG
TPVG logoTPVG
FANG logoFANG
DVN logoDVN
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionAsset ManagementOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$1.37B$2.53B$243M$53.57B$28.19B
Revenue (TTM)$309M$2.06B$97M$15.19B$12.24B
Net Income (TTM)$72M$-623M$-12M$403M$2.15B
Gross Margin103.3%30.6%83.5%41.8%21.8%
Operating Margin37.2%26.0%77.9%22.1%18.9%
Forward P/E15.8x6.8x6.5x10.7x8.6x
Total Debt$451M$2.40B$469M$14.49B$8.78B
Cash & Equiv.$44M$14M$20M$106M$1.43B

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KRP
NOG
TPVG
FANG
DVN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kimbell Royalty Par… (KRP)100211.7+111.7%
Northern Oil and Ga… (NOG)100307.3+207.3%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10059.8-40.2%
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG)100447.3+347.3%
Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN)100419.6+319.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Devon Energy Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
The Income Pick

KRP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 9.8%
  • Beta 0.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 8.64x
Best for: income & stability and defensive
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
The Income Angle

NOG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
  • 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs NOG's -3.2%
  • Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x)
  • 50.6% margin vs NOG's -30.3%
Best for: growth exposure
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 162.5% 10Y total return vs DVN's 99.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
The Defensive Pick

DVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.05 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
  • +52.9% vs NOG's +5.3%
  • 9.1% ROA vs NOG's -11.3%, ROIC 12.3% vs 10.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPVG logoTPVG36.6% NII/revenue growth vs NOG's -3.2%
ValueTPVG logoTPVGLower P/E (6.5x vs 8.6x)
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs NOG's -30.3%
Stability / SafetyDVN logoDVNBeta 0.05 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG17.1% yield, vs NOG's 7.3%
Momentum (1Y)DVN logoDVN+52.9% vs NOG's +5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)DVN logoDVN9.1% ROA vs NOG's -11.3%, ROIC 12.3% vs 10.0%

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KRPKimbell Royalty Partners, LP
FY 2025
Oil and Gas
53.7%$317M
Oil and Condensate
33.1%$195M
Natural Gas, Midstream
13.3%$78M
NOGNorthern Oil and Gas, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil and Gas
82.1%$2.1B
Natural Gas and NGL
17.9%$454M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil Exploration and Production
88.3%$25.1B
Oil Purchased
5.2%$1.5B
Natural Gas Liquids Production
5.0%$1.4B
Natural Gas, Production
1.4%$400M
DVNDevon Energy Corporation
FY 2025
N G L Product Sales
100.0%$11.2B

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRPLAGGINGNOG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KRP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 156.3x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOG's -30.3%. On growth, FANG holds the edge at +5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$309M$2.1B$97M$15.2B$12.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$177M$1.3B-$22M$8.6B$5.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$72M-$623M-$12M$403M$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$241M-$115M$35M$1.6B$2.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+103.3%+30.6%+83.5%+41.8%+21.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.2%+26.0%+77.9%+22.1%+18.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.2%-30.3%+50.6%+2.7%+17.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+78.0%-5.6%-58.7%+10.5%+16.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.4%-6.2%+5.2%-99.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-76.2%-4.8%-2.3%-98.3%-100.0%
KRP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 92% valuation discount to NOG's 61.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NOG's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRP's 13.4x.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$2.5B$243M$53.6B$28.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$4.9B$691M$68.0B$35.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS31.57x61.38x4.91x33.24x10.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.80x6.80x6.50x10.68x8.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.37x3.44x9.13x6.83x4.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.12x1.21x2.50x3.57x1.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.28x1.12x0.68x1.28x1.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.59x10.02x10.23x9.04x
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NOG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRP scores 6/9 vs FANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%-29.1%-3.4%+0.9%+18.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.8%-11.3%-1.5%+0.6%+9.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.8%+10.0%+7.2%+6.7%+12.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.4%+12.4%+9.4%+7.6%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.58x1.13x1.33x0.34x0.57x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$407M$2.4B$449M$14.4B$7.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$44M$14M$20M$106M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$451M$2.4B$469M$14.5B$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.04x0.94x-1.02x0.66x7.98x
DVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FANG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $26,372 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, DVN leads with a +52.9% total return vs NOG's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 16.3% vs NOG's -3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.8%+10.8%-6.3%+25.7%+20.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.4%+5.3%+19.3%+50.1%+52.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.6%-9.4%-3.4%+57.5%-2.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+81.5%+81.8%-13.5%+163.7%+120.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.4%-34.4%+93.3%+162.5%+99.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.3%-3.3%-1.2%+16.3%-0.7%
FANG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KRP and DVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRP currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs NOG's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.21x0.60x0.83x0.09x0.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.65$32.62$7.53$214.51$52.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.31$20.18$4.48$127.75$29.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.8%+73.4%+79.5%+88.8%+86.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.537.358.349.743.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded829K2.7M504K3.4M15.3M
Evenly matched — KRP and DVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NOG and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KRP as "Buy", NOG as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", FANG as "Buy", DVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 5.7% for FANG (target: $201). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs FANG's 2.10%.

MetricKRP logoKRPKimbell Royalty P…NOG logoNOGNorthern Oil and …TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$29.00$8.95$201.27$53.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts1813125164
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.8%+7.3%+17.1%+2.1%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.42$1.75$1.02$4.00$0.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+13.1%+2.3%0.0%+3.8%+3.7%
Evenly matched — NOG and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KRP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallKimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KRP vs NOG vs TPVG vs FANG vs DVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. at 61. 4x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +163. 7%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FANG returned +162. 5% versus NOG's -34. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 1481% more volatile than DVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -3. 2% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 4% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 1. 9% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 22. 0% for DVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRP leads at 93. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 2. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).

09

Is KRP or NOG or TPVG or FANG or DVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 2. 1% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +162. 5%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KRP and NOG and TPVG and FANG and DVN?

These companies operate in different sectors (KRP (Energy) and NOG (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services) and FANG (Energy) and DVN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KRP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NOG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KRP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FANG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DVN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KRP and NOG and TPVG and FANG and DVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KRP: -27.4% · NOG: -6.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KRP: 31.6x · NOG: 61.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.