KRP vs SLB

For growth investors, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for SLB N. V. (SLB). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, SLB N.

V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, SLB N.

V. (SLB) delivered a total return of +94. 3%, compared to +94. 0% for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRP returned +35. 7% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

21β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 87β — meaning SLB is approximately 320% more volatile than KRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SLB N. V. (SLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 73% for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -1. 6% for SLB N. V. (SLB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for SLB N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

8% net margin versus 9. 4% for SLB N. V. — meaning it keeps 16. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRP leads at 39. 8% versus 15. 3% for SLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRP leads at 93. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) trades at 15.

9x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for SLB N. V. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRP: 16. 5% to $17. 00.

In this comparison, SLB (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. KRP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRP: +35. 7%, SLB: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SLB pays a dividend while KRP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.