Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$560M
5Y Perf.+52.1%
GEF
Greif, Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.22B
5Y Perf.+12.5%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
SON
Sonoco Products Company

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.09B
5Y Perf.-21.2%
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.21B
5Y Perf.-14.9%

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KRT logoKRT
GEF logoGEF
SLGN logoSLGN
SON logoSON
SEE logoSEE
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$560M$3.22B$4.25B$5.09B$6.21B
Revenue (TTM)$481M$3.35B$6.58B$7.49B$5.36B
Net Income (TTM)$32M$971M$283M$1.04B$506M
Gross Margin35.9%22.6%17.4%20.9%29.8%
Operating Margin8.8%3.0%9.8%8.7%13.5%
Forward P/E15.5x17.5x10.6x8.9x12.4x
Total Debt$57M$1.57B$4.62B$4.85B$4.10B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$257M$1.08B$378M$344M

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KRT
GEF
SLGN
SON
SEE
StockApr 21May 26Return
Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT)100152.1+52.1%
Greif, Inc. (GEF)100112.5+12.5%
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)10095.5-4.5%
Sonoco Products Com… (SON)10078.8-21.2%
Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE)10085.1-14.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GEF leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Sealed Air Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. KRT and SON also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.81, yield 6.4%, current ratio 2.22x
  • 6.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.1%
Best for: defensive
GEF
Greif, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GEF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 153.9% 10Y total return vs KRT's 79.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 51.5%, current ratio 1.47x
  • PEG 0.38 vs SEE's 9.73
  • PEG 0.38 vs 9.73
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SLGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
SON
Sonoco Products Company
The Income Pick

SON is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.1%
  • Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
  • 41.7% revenue growth vs GEF's -1.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation
The Defensive Choice

SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.

  • Beta 0.31 vs KRT's 0.81
  • +39.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Best for: stability and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSON logoSON41.7% revenue growth vs GEF's -1.0%
ValueGEF logoGEFPEG 0.38 vs 9.73
Quality / MarginsGEF logoGEF29.0% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
Stability / SafetySEE logoSEEBeta 0.31 vs KRT's 0.81
DividendsKRT logoKRT6.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.1%
Momentum (1Y)SEE logoSEE+39.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GEF logoGEF16.5% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 4.7% vs 8.7%

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KRTKarat Packaging Inc.
FY 2025
National Distribution
78.4%$371M
Online
15.9%$75M
Retail
4.6%$22M
Logistics Services
1.0%$5M
GEFGreif, Inc.
FY 2024
Global Industrial Packaging
57.3%$3.1B
Paper Packaging And Services
42.3%$2.3B
Land Management
0.4%$20M
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Containers
48.4%$3.1B
Dispensing and Specialty Closures
41.8%$2.7B
Custom Containers
9.8%$638M
SONSonoco Products Company
FY 2025
Consumer Packaging
66.9%$4.9B
Industrial Paper Packaging Segment
33.1%$2.4B
SEESealed Air Corporation
FY 2024
Food Care
66.4%$3.6B
Protective
33.6%$1.8B

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRTLAGGINGSON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 15.6x KRT's $481M. GEF is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, KRT holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$481M$3.3B$6.6B$7.5B$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$51M$322M$966M$1.2B$965M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$32M$971M$283M$1.0B$506M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$30M-$123M$307M$266M$459M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.9%+22.6%+17.4%+20.9%+29.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.8%+3.0%+9.8%+8.7%+13.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.6%+29.0%+4.3%+13.8%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.1%-3.7%+4.7%+3.6%+8.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.9%-22.6%+6.5%-1.9%+2.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.3%-73.2%-6.3%+23.6%+16.4%
SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GEF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.5x trailing earnings, GEF trades at a 75% valuation discount to KRT's 18.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GEF offers better value at 0.10x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Market CapShares × price$560M$3.2B$4.3B$5.1B$6.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$579M$4.5B$7.8B$9.6B$10.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.99x4.54x14.91x12.95x12.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.48x17.54x10.57x8.86x12.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.70x0.10x0.91x9.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.31x8.21x7.97x7.76x14.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.20x0.75x0.66x0.68x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.61x1.06x1.89x1.41x5.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.12x10.07x12.95x13.54x
GEF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. KRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.0%+33.7%+12.5%+30.0%+48.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.7%+16.5%+3.0%+9.0%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.4%+4.7%+8.7%+6.2%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.7%+5.7%+9.9%+8.3%+14.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966875
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.52x2.03x1.34x3.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$19M$1.3B$3.5B$4.5B$3.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$257M$1.1B$378M$344M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$57M$1.6B$4.6B$4.9B$4.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense14.44x90.09x3.36x4.60x1.95x
KRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRT five years ago would be worth $18,402 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,122 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +39.8% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRT at 31.7% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.5%+0.3%-1.9%+18.6%+2.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+9.3%+28.1%-23.7%+20.4%+39.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+128.3%+18.2%-11.1%-2.5%+2.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.0%+22.5%+1.8%-10.0%-18.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.3%+153.9%+80.8%+49.4%+4.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.7%+5.7%-3.8%-0.8%+0.8%
KRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRT's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.63x0.65x0.53x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.68$77.14$57.04$58.43$44.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.61$53.82$36.15$38.65$28.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.9%+88.2%+70.6%+88.2%+95.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.252.549.648.764.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded82K207K766K1.1M3.0M
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KRT and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KRT as "Buy", GEF as "Hold", SLGN as "Buy", SON as "Buy", SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, KRT offers the higher dividend yield at 6.37% vs SEE's 1.92%.

MetricKRT logoKRTKarat Packaging I…GEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.50$75.00$50.50$59.00$43.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts613212127
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.4%+3.1%+2.0%+4.1%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4021300
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.79$2.12$0.80$2.09$0.81
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+0.3%+1.6%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — KRT and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). KRT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallKarat Packaging Inc. (KRT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KRT vs GEF vs SLGN vs SON vs SEE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Greif, Inc. (GEF). Greif, Inc. (GEF) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

On trailing P/E, Greif, Inc.

(GEF) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Karat Packaging Inc. at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Greif, Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

Over the past 5 years, Karat Packaging Inc.

(KRT) delivered a total return of +84. 0%, compared to -18. 8% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEF returned +153. 9% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Karat Packaging Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning KRT is approximately 157% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.

7% versus -1. 0% for Greif, Inc. (GEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greif, Inc. grew EPS 223. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

Greif, Inc.

(GEF) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 6. 9% for GEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRT leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Greif, Inc. (GEF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Greif, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).

09

Is KRT or GEF or SLGN or SON or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, KRT: +79. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KRT and GEF and SLGN and SON and SEE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; GEF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GEF

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLGN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SON

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KRT and GEF and SLGN and SON and SEE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KRT: 12.9% · GEF: -22.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(KRT: 6.6% · GEF: 29.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KRT: 18.0x · GEF: 4.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.