KRT vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON

For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.

3x versus Karat Packaging Inc. at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Karat Packaging Inc.

(KRT) delivered a total return of +84. 0%, compared to -18. 8% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +80. 8% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Karat Packaging Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning KRT is approximately 157% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.

7% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 8. 8% for KRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRT leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Karat Packaging Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, KRT: +79. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.