Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
Semiconductors
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $9M | $11.55B | $230.92B | $895M | $627.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $4.16B | $44.49B | $3.98B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $634M | $9.92B | $114M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | -37.5% | 45.0% | 54.8% | 28.4% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -254.0% | 20.6% | 25.5% | 6.1% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.3x | 20.4x | 5.8x | 116.5x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.28B | $16.37B | $1.17B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $356M | $7.84B | $102M | $14.27B |
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 255.8 | +155.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, KSCP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.90 vs QCOM's 9.80
- Beta 0.66 vs KSCP's 2.63
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- 382.4% 10Y total return vs INTC's 350.5%
- Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs KSCP's -15.6%
ASGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 116.5x)
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +494.7% vs ASGN's -62.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs KSCP's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 116.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs KSCP's -256.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs KSCP's 2.63 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs ASGN's -62.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs KSCP's -72.4%, ROIC 29.1% vs -242.5% |
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASGN leads 1 • INTC leads 1 • KSCP leads 0 • ALLE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.8B annually — 4630.7x KSCP's $12M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KSCP's -2.6%. On growth, KSCP holds the edge at +23.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $4.2B | $44.5B | $4.0B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $959M | $12.8B | $360M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | $634M | $9.9B | $114M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $704M | $12.5B | $288M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -37.5% | +45.0% | +54.8% | +28.4% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +20.6% | +25.5% | +6.1% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | +2.9% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +16.9% | +28.1% | +7.2% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +9.7% | -3.5% | -0.5% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.6% | -7.0% | +173.0% | -37.9% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ASGN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ASGN trades at a 82% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.06x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $11.5B | $230.9B | $895M | $627.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $13.5B | $239.5B | $2.0B | $659.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.27x | 18.06x | 43.73x | 8.06x | -2120.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.33x | 20.37x | 5.80x | 116.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | 21.03x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.62x | 17.16x | 5.30x | 56.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 2.84x | 5.21x | 0.22x | 11.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 5.62x | 11.42x | 0.51x | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.84x | 18.01x | 3.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-111 for KSCP. KSCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLE's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLE scores 6/9 vs KSCP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -110.5% | +32.1% | +40.2% | +6.3% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.4% | +12.3% | +18.4% | +3.1% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +18.1% | +29.1% | +6.9% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -165.1% | +20.8% | +28.9% | +7.2% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 1.10x | 0.77x | 0.65x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $1.9B | $8.5B | $1.1B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $356M | $7.8B | $102M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.3B | $16.4B | $1.2B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -93.88x | 8.61x | 17.60x | 1.96x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INTC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INTC five years ago would be worth $22,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $101 for KSCP. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs ASGN's -62.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INTC at 59.8% vs KSCP's -51.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | -16.2% | +27.2% | -55.1% | +217.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | -3.2% | +53.4% | -62.9% | +494.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | +30.3% | +111.7% | -68.2% | +307.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +0.6% | +82.3% | -80.1% | +129.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +123.6% | +382.4% | -41.9% | +350.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.3% | +9.2% | +28.4% | -31.7% | +59.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLE and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KSCP's 2.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QCOM currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs KSCP's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.63x | 0.66x | 1.64x | 1.33x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.14 | $183.11 | $228.04 | $60.75 | $130.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.92 | $131.25 | $121.99 | $19.31 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +73.4% | +96.1% | +34.5% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 41.5 | 82.6 | 18.4 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 563K | 886K | 15.6M | 953K | 113.6M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALLE as "Hold", QCOM as "Hold", ASGN as "Hold", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.4% upside for ASGN (target: $38) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs ALLE's 1.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $172.50 | $185.56 | $37.60 | $79.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 69 | 13 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +1.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 23 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.03 | $3.44 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.7% | +3.8% | +19.0% | 0.0% |
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KSCP vs ALLE vs QCOM vs ASGN vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger pick with 13.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allegion plc (ALLE) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
On trailing P/E, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 90x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Intel Corporation (INTC) delivered a total return of +129.
0%, compared to -99. 0% for Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +382. 4% versus KSCP's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Knightscope, Inc. 's 2. 63β — meaning KSCP is approximately 298% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 110% for Allegion plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is pulling ahead at 13.
7% versus -15. 6% for Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, KSCP leads at 46. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -293. 7% for Knightscope, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -274. 7% for KSCP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 110. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
6% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. KSCP, ASGN, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KSCP or ALLE or QCOM or ASGN or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 1. 5% yield, +123. 6% 10Y return). Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP) carries a higher beta of 2. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +123. 6%, KSCP: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KSCP and ALLE and QCOM and ASGN and INTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (KSCP (Industrials) and ALLE (Industrials) and QCOM (Technology) and ASGN (Technology) and INTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KSCP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ALLE, QCOM pay a dividend while KSCP, ASGN, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.