Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KSPI vs BEKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
KSPI vs BEKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $16.54B | $61.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63T | $103.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.10T | $3.48B |
| Gross Margin | 64.3% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 51.3% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 3.3x |
| Total Debt | $221.46B | $22.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $619.47B | $11.44B |
KSPI vs BEKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint Stock Company… (KSPI) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
| KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KSPI vs BEKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KSPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 8.4%
- Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth 24.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.7%
- 15.4% 10Y total return vs BEKE's -47.8%
BEKE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 31.7%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 0.83 vs KSPI's 1.02
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs BEKE's 20.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 3.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.3% margin vs BEKE's 3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs KSPI's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 8.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BEKE's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.7% vs BEKE's -4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs BEKE's 2.7%, ROIC 113.5% vs 3.7% |
KSPI vs BEKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KSPI vs BEKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KSPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KSPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.63T annually — 35.0x BEKE's $103.5B. KSPI is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEKE's 3.4%. On growth, KSPI holds the edge at +70.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.63T | $103.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.89T | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.10T | $3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358.4B | $2.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.3% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -32.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KSPI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.4x trailing earnings, KSPI trades at a 80% valuation discount to BEKE's 36.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KSPI's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEKE's 89.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.5B | $61.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.7B | $63.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.39x | 36.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 3.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.71x | 89.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.89x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.75x | 49.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KSPI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KSPI delivers a 56.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $57 in annual profit, vs $5 for BEKE. KSPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEKE's 0.32x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.9% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.6% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +113.5% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +92.5% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$398.0B | $11.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $619.5B | $11.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $221.5B | $22.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.20x | 131.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KSPI and BEKE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KSPI five years ago would be worth $11,100 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,837 for BEKE. Over the past 12 months, KSPI leads with a -2.7% total return vs BEKE's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEKE at 7.0% vs KSPI's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.7% | -4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | +22.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | -61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BEKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KSPI's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.20 | $20.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.59 | $14.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 75.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 579K | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KSPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KSPI as "Buy" and BEKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for BEKE (target: $22) vs 9.6% for KSPI (target: $95). For income investors, KSPI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.41% vs BEKE's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.00 | $22.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3374.49 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.2% |
KSPI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BEKE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KSPI vs BEKE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KSPI or BEKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) is the stronger pick with 33. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 2% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE). Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) offers the better valuation at 7. 4x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KSPI or BEKE?
On trailing P/E, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) is the cheapest at 7. 4x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KSPI or BEKE?
Over the past 5 years, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) delivered a total return of +11. 0%, compared to -61. 6% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KSPI returned +15. 4% versus BEKE's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KSPI or BEKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz's 1. 02β — meaning KSPI is approximately 23% more volatile than BEKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 32% for KE Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KSPI or BEKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) is pulling ahead at 33. 4% versus 20. 2% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz grew EPS 24. 0% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KSPI leads at 41. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KSPI or BEKE?
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) is the more profitable company, earning 41. 2% net margin versus 4. 3% for KE Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KSPI leads at 50. 4% versus 4. 0% for BEKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KSPI leads at 62. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KSPI or BEKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.
kz (KSPI) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 3. 3x for KE Holdings Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BEKE: 20. 1% to $22. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — KSPI or BEKE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) offers the highest yield at 8. 4%, versus 1. 9% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE).
09Is KSPI or BEKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -47. 8%, KSPI: +15. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KSPI and BEKE?
These companies operate in different sectors (KSPI (Technology) and BEKE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.