Department Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Department Stores | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.61B | $2.66B | $3.60B | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.53B | $1.28B | $5.27B | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $271M | $206M | $507M | $192M |
| Gross Margin | 36.1% | 48.9% | 58.6% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 20.1% | 13.4% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 12.9x | 8.0x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.45B | $326M | $1.17B | $1.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $674M | $267M | $760M | $239M |
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kohl's Corporation (KSS) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 675.6 | +575.6% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 181.7 | +81.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KSS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs ANF's +12.7%
BKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 7.5%
- 225.7% 10Y total return vs ANF's 219.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
- Beta 0.89, yield 7.5%, current ratio 2.05x
ANF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs KSS's -4.3%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 12.1x)
AEO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs KSS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs KSS's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs KSS's 2.32 | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield, vs KSS's 3.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs ANF's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs KSS's 2.0%, ROIC 38.4% vs 4.6% |
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKE leads in 3 of 6 categories
KSS leads 1 • ANF leads 1 • AEO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.5B annually — 12.2x BKE's $1.3B. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KSS's 1.7%. On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.5B | $1.3B | $5.3B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $282M | $862M | $546M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $271M | $206M | $507M | $192M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $215M | $378M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +48.9% | +58.6% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +20.1% | +13.4% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +16.1% | +9.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +16.8% | +7.2% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +9.3% | +5.4% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +153.5% | +9.1% | +3.1% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, KSS trades at a 60% valuation discount to AEO's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KSS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKE's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.7B | $3.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $2.7B | $4.0B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.06x | 13.46x | 7.51x | 15.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.26x | 12.87x | 7.98x | 12.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.80x | 10.31x | 4.68x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 2.18x | 0.68x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 6.22x | 2.68x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.46x | 13.31x | 9.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $7 for KSS. KSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KSS scores 7/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +44.4% | +38.5% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +20.6% | +15.1% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +38.4% | +31.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +35.3% | +30.5% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.77x | 0.82x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $59M | $409M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $674M | $267M | $760M | $239M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $326M | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | — | 302.38x | 75.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,516 for KSS. Over the past 12 months, KSS leads with a +127.8% total return vs ANF's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs KSS's -3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.1% | +4.1% | -36.6% | -35.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.8% | +57.4% | +12.7% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +93.6% | +237.1% | +34.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +63.6% | +92.7% | -48.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +225.7% | +219.7% | +45.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +24.6% | +49.9% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KSS's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs KSS's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 0.89x | 1.42x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.22 | $61.69 | $133.11 | $28.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.47 | $35.60 | $65.45 | $9.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.9% | +84.9% | +59.0% | +58.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 52.5 | 33.0 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 395K | 1.2M | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BKE and AEO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KSS as "Hold", BKE as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", AEO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.9% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs 1.2% for BKE (target: $53). For income investors, BKE offers the higher dividend yield at 7.52% vs KSS's 3.39%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $53.00 | $120.80 | $24.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 20 | 55 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +7.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $3.94 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.5% | 0.0% |
BKE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KSS vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Kohl's Corporation (KSS). Kohl's Corporation (KSS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kohl's Corporation (KSS) a "Hold" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
On trailing P/E, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to -64. 8% for Kohl's Corporation (KSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +225. 7% versus KSS's -25. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Kohl's Corporation's 2. 32β — meaning KSS is approximately 159% more volatile than BKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -4. 3% for Kohl's Corporation (KSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kohl's Corporation grew EPS 144. 3% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 1. 8% for Kohl's Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 3% for KSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for The Buckle, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 53. 9% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO?
In this comparison, BKE (7.
5% yield), KSS (3. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ANF, AEO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KSS or BKE or ANF or AEO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 5% yield, +225. 7% 10Y return). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +225. 7%, AEO: +45. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KSS and BKE and ANF and AEO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KSS, BKE pay a dividend while ANF, AEO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.