Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KT
KT Corporation

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$10.11B
5Y Perf.+7.7%
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$13.93B
5Y Perf.+68.1%
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$24.57B
5Y Perf.+58.4%
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-67.2%

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KT logoKT
SKM logoSKM
VIV logoVIV
CHA logoCHA
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$10.11B$13.93B$24.57B$1.32B
Revenue (TTM)$28.21T$17.10T$59.83B$13.27B
Net Income (TTM)$1.73T$407.83B$6.20B$1.80B
Gross Margin67.1%88.0%43.6%47.2%
Operating Margin8.7%11.9%15.8%15.3%
Forward P/E0.0x0.0x2.8x1.2x
Total Debt$12.21T$10.77T$20.75B$548M
Cash & Equiv.$3.51T$1.49T$6.69B$4.75B

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KT
SKM
VIV
CHA
StockApr 25May 26Return
KT Corporation (KT)100107.7+7.7%
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)100168.1+68.1%
Telefônica Brasil S… (VIV)100158.4+58.4%
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)10032.8-67.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CHA leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. KT Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SKM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KT
KT Corporation
The Income Pick

KT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.8%
  • Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 277.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 62.7%, current ratio 1.20x
  • PEG 0.00 vs VIV's 1.03
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder

SKM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 239.9% 10Y total return vs VIV's 81.5%
  • Beta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79
  • +77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.
The Income Angle

VIV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
The Growth Leader

CHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
  • 13.6% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
  • 15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%
Best for: growth and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA logoCHA167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
ValueKT logoKTLower P/E (0.0x vs 2.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 1.03
Quality / MarginsCHA logoCHA13.6% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
Stability / SafetySKM logoSKMBeta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79
DividendsKT logoKT3.8% yield, vs SKM's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SKM logoSKM+77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CHA logoCHA15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KTKT Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A.
FY 2025
Services
90.0%$74.1B
Sale Of Goods
10.0%$8.3B
CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKTLAGGINGCHA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.21T annually — 2126.2x CHA's $13.3B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, VIV holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$28.21T$17.10T$59.8B$13.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.39T$5.58T$24.5B$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.73T$407.8B$6.2B$1.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$984.0B$1.33T$11.3B$2.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.1%+88.0%+43.6%+47.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.7%+11.9%+15.8%+15.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%+2.4%+10.4%+13.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.5%+7.8%+18.9%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%-4.1%+8.7%-9.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+127.8%-60.7%+11.1%-41.8%
VIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KT and CHA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 89% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 0.00x vs VIV's 8.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
Market CapShares × price$10.1B$13.9B$24.6B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.1B$20.3B$27.4B$706M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.45x51.50x22.53x5.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x0.01x2.78x1.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x0.00x8.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.64x6.41x5.93x1.63x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.51x1.17x2.18x0.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.79x1.61x1.79x4.98x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.76x11.75x11.53x3.47x
Evenly matched — KT and CHA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CHA delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKM's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs SKM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.1%+3.4%+9.0%+20.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%+1.4%+4.8%+15.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.9%+3.8%+7.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.4%+4.8%+8.6%+99.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97578
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.63x0.86x0.30x0.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.70T$9.28T$14.1B-$4.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.51T$1.49T$6.7B$4.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12.21T$10.77T$20.7B$548M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.61x2.80x15.03x
CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VIV five years ago would be worth $20,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,656 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs CHA's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIV at 26.6% vs CHA's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.0%+76.6%+27.9%-10.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.6%+77.0%+60.1%-63.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+99.5%+92.2%+103.0%-63.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.7%+96.5%+108.8%-63.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.1%+239.9%+81.5%-63.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.9%+24.3%+26.6%-28.5%
Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SKM is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 31.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.34x0.53x0.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.58$40.46$17.25$35.42
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.54$19.66$9.41$8.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.3%+89.7%+89.1%+31.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.257.149.355.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M1.7M989K488K
SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: KT as "Buy", SKM as "Hold", VIV as "Hold", CHA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for CHA (target: $14) vs 7.3% for VIV (target: $17). For income investors, KT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs VIV's 2.03%.

MetricKT logoKTKT CorporationSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts571215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+3.2%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1161.87$1661.27$1.54
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%0.0%+2.3%+2.3%
KT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

VIV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CHA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallKT Corporation (KT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KT Corporation (KT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.

5x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, KT Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KT Corporation wins at 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

Over the past 5 years, Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) delivered a total return of +108. 8%, compared to -63. 4% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 9% versus CHA's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 79β — meaning CHA is approximately 134% more volatile than SKM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 86% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.

4% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KT Corporation grew EPS 277. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIV leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23. 3% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHA leads at 45. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, KT Corporation (KT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KT Corporation (KT) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 2. 8x for Telefônica Brasil S. A. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 27. 4% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA?

In this comparison, KT (3.

8% yield), SKM (3. 2% yield), VIV (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +239. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 9%, CHA: -63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KT and SKM and VIV and CHA?

These companies operate in different sectors (KT (Communication Services) and SKM (Communication Services) and VIV (Communication Services) and CHA (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VIV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock. KT, SKM, VIV pay a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VIV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KT and SKM and VIV and CHA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KT: 3.6% · SKM: -4.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(KT: 6.1% · SKM: 2.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KT: 8.4x · SKM: 51.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.