Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KTB vs GES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
KTB vs GES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $877M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.15B | $3.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $227M | $80M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 42.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.29B | $1.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $188M |
KTB vs GES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) | 100 | 534.0 | +434.0% |
| Guess', Inc. (GES) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KTB vs GES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth -7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 122.8% 10Y total return vs GES's 56.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 1.82x
GES is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.6%
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.50x
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.0% revenue growth vs GES's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs GES's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs KTB's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs GES's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs KTB's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 25.7% vs 7.8% |
KTB vs GES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KTB vs GES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTB and GES operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $3.1B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.2% (KTB) to 2.6% (GES). On growth, KTB holds the edge at +45.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $408M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $227M | $80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433M | $123M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +42.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.7% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.9% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, KTB trades at a 12% valuation discount to GES's 21.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GES's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTB's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $877M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.28x | 21.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.20x | 10.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.19x | 8.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.75x | 2.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.66x | 24.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTB leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTB delivers a 45.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $14 for GES. KTB carries lower financial leverage with a 2.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GES's 2.58x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.1% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.2% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.7% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.5% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.29x | 2.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $188M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.19x | 3.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTB five years ago would be worth $13,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,055 for GES. Over the past 12 months, GES leads with a +57.5% total return vs KTB's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTB at 27.6% vs GES's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.9% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.5% | +22.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.0% | -19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.8% | +56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GES is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTB's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GES currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs KTB's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.00 | $17.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.55 | $10.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 775K | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KTB and GES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KTB as "Buy" and GES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for GES (target: $26) vs 2.9% for KTB (target: $80). For income investors, GES offers the higher dividend yield at 5.57% vs KTB's 2.65%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.33 | $26.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.07 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +6.9% |
KTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GES leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KTB vs GES: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KTB or GES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Guess', Inc. (GES). Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KTB or GES?
On trailing P/E, Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus Guess', Inc. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Guess', Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KTB or GES?
Over the past 5 years, Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) delivered a total return of +36. 0%, compared to -19. 5% for Guess', Inc. (GES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTB returned +122. 8% versus GES's +56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KTB or GES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Kontoor Brands, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning KTB is approximately 50% more volatile than GES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Guess', Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KTB or GES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus 7. 9% for Guess', Inc. (GES). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kontoor Brands, Inc. grew EPS -7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -75. 1% for Guess', Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KTB or GES?
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 2% net margin versus 2. 0% for Guess', Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTB leads at 14. 1% versus 5. 8% for GES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KTB leads at 46. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KTB or GES more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Guess', Inc.
(GES) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Kontoor Brands, Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — KTB or GES?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Guess', Inc. (GES) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 2. 7% for Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB).
09Is KTB or GES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, KTB: +122. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KTB and GES?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KTB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.