Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $35M | $11.21B | $7.17B | $6.98B | $37.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418M | $1.03B | $785M | $4.31B | $32.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $29M | $-65M | $188M | $809M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 10.1% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 12.3% | -9.0% | 5.2% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.9x | 80.3x | 32.6x | 28.8x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $552M | $0.00 | $175M | $3.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $152M | $364M | $307M | $1.93B |
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Tronic Corporat… (KTCC) | 100 | 82.9 | -17.1% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.2 | +132.2% |
| Plexus Corp. (PLXS) | 100 | 415.1 | +315.1% |
| Jabil Inc. (JBL) | 100 | 1187.0 | +1087.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KTCC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.53 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage
SMTC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 86.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- +253.5% vs KTCC's +40.7%
SLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 34.3% revenue growth vs KTCC's -17.5%
PLXS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.65
- 4.4% margin vs SLAB's -8.3%
- 5.9% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 11.8% vs -6.9%
JBL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs PLXS's 5.2%
- PEG 0.38 vs PLXS's 3.34
- Lower P/E (28.8x vs 32.6x), PEG 0.38 vs 3.34
- 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs KTCC's -17.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.8x vs 32.6x), PEG 0.38 vs 3.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.4% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.5% vs KTCC's +40.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 11.8% vs -6.9% |
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTCC leads in 1 of 6 categories
PLXS leads 1 • SMTC leads 1 • SLAB leads 0 • JBL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMTC and SLAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBL is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.7B annually — 78.2x KTCC's $418M. PLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418M | $1.0B | $785M | $4.3B | $32.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $173M | -$32M | $261M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $29M | -$65M | $188M | $809M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $143M | $66M | $76M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +52.0% | +58.2% | +10.1% | +9.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +12.3% | -9.0% | +5.2% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +2.8% | -8.3% | +4.4% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +13.9% | +8.4% | +1.8% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +12.7% | +25.2% | +18.7% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.7% | +67.4% | +88.8% | +29.1% | +96.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KTCC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.6x trailing earnings, PLXS trades at a 29% valuation discount to JBL's 59.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBL offers better value at 0.78x vs PLXS's 4.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $11.2B | $7.2B | $7.0B | $37.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $152M | $11.6B | $6.8B | $6.9B | $39.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.22x | -53.76x | -109.92x | 41.65x | 59.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.86x | 80.34x | 32.57x | 28.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.27x | 0.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.00x | 104.59x | — | 24.46x | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 12.33x | 9.14x | 1.73x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 16.04x | 6.51x | 4.95x | 25.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.38x | 256.13x | 109.03x | 45.36x | 32.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBL delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-13 for KTCC. PLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBL's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLXS scores 9/9 vs JBL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.4% | +5.1% | -5.9% | +12.8% | +58.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.7% | +2.0% | -5.1% | +5.9% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +4.9% | -6.9% | +11.8% | +30.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +5.4% | -6.3% | +12.9% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 1.02x | — | 0.12x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $400M | -$364M | -$131M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $152M | $364M | $307M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $552M | $0 | $175M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.30x | 2.45x | -58.63x | 19.62x | 4.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMTC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JBL five years ago would be worth $64,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,610 for KTCC. Over the past 12 months, SMTC leads with a +253.5% total return vs KTCC's +40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs KTCC's -17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +61.4% | +65.0% | +71.3% | +45.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.7% | +253.5% | +100.3% | +107.2% | +129.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.5% | +547.3% | +59.0% | +201.9% | +347.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | +89.8% | +61.0% | +174.0% | +540.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +460.9% | +375.0% | +515.8% | +1957.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.3% | +86.4% | +16.7% | +44.5% | +64.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KTCC and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KTCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs KTCC's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 2.75x | 1.20x | 1.64x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.70 | $127.19 | $218.66 | $275.83 | $372.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $33.06 | $106.01 | $115.35 | $148.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +95.5% | +99.5% | +94.5% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 69.3 | 66.1 | 74.2 | 78.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 2.4M | 465K | 344K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMTC as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy", PLXS as "Buy", JBL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.8% upside for SLAB (target: $212) vs -28.0% for SMTC (target: $87).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.44 | $211.60 | $251.25 | $273.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 | 37 | 18 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.7% |
KTCC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PLXS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
KTCC vs SMTC vs SLAB vs PLXS vs JBL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC). Plexus Corp. (PLXS) offers the better valuation at 41. 6x trailing P/E (32. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semtech Corporation (SMTC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
On trailing P/E, Plexus Corp.
(PLXS) is the cheapest at 41. 6x versus Jabil Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, Jabil Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Jabil Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Plexus Corp. 's 3. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
Over the past 5 years, Jabil Inc.
(JBL) delivered a total return of +540. 6%, compared to -53. 9% for Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBL returned +1990% versus KTCC's -51. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 75β — meaning SMTC is approximately 314% more volatile than KTCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plexus Corp. (PLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Jabil Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -17. 5% for Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -196. 2% for Key Tronic Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTC leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
Plexus Corp.
(PLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMTC leads at 6. 8% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Jabil Inc. (JBL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Plexus Corp. 's 3. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jabil Inc. (JBL) trades at 28. 8x forward P/E versus 80. 3x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 51. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLAB: -2. 8% to $211. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KTCC or SMTC or SLAB or PLXS or JBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66)). Semtech Corporation (SMTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTCC: -51. 7%, SMTC: +462. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KTCC and SMTC and SLAB and PLXS and JBL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KTCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.