Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $10.68B | $4.67B | $9.83B | $182.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $300K | $78M | $92.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $-618M | $-957M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | — | 11.2% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 73.5x | — | — | 4979.1x |
| Total Debt | $180M | $42M | $61M | $54.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $561M | $1.02B | $241M | $10.92B |
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 207.8 | +107.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KTOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs BA's 94.6%
- Lower P/E (73.5x vs 4979.1x)
- +58.1% vs ACHR's -26.6%
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JOBY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
BA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- Beta 0.97 vs ACHR's 2.96
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (73.5x vs 4979.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC -9.5% vs -54.7% |
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories
BA leads 1 • ACHR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 307280.0x ACHR's $300,000. BA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $300,000 | $78M | $92.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | -$709M | -$759M | -$3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | -$618M | -$957M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$133M | -$512M | -$661M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | — | +11.2% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -2060.7% | -12.3% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | -1705.7% | -8.5% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.6% | — | — | +14.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.3% | +43.5% | -9.1% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KTOS and ACHR and JOBY and BA each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 93.2x trailing earnings, BA trades at a 79% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.7B | $4.7B | $9.8B | $182.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $3.7B | $9.6B | $225.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 438.46x | -6.34x | -8.85x | 93.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 73.49x | — | — | 4979.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 118.42x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.93x | 9999.00x | 183.94x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.94x | 1.78x | 5.86x | 32.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KTOS and ACHR and BA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | -37.8% | -74.2% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | -32.9% | -52.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | -89.6% | -54.7% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | -44.3% | -49.8% | -9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.02x | 0.04x | 9.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$381M | -$979M | -$180M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $561M | $1.0B | $241M | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $42M | $61M | $54.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.16x | — | — | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTOS five years ago would be worth $21,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,369 for ACHR. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -22.8% | -30.4% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.1% | -26.6% | +55.7% | +24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +331.5% | +193.5% | +128.7% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.3% | -36.3% | +1.0% | -1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1231.8% | -37.0% | -4.8% | +94.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.8% | +43.2% | +31.8% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BA is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 2.96x | 2.70x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.00 | $14.62 | $20.95 | $254.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.85 | $4.80 | $6.32 | $176.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.5% | +43.0% | +47.7% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 61.5 | 65.5 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 27.6M | 24.7M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KTOS as "Buy", ACHR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 14.1% for BA (target: $264). BA is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $110.58 | $12.33 | $15.90 | $263.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 9 | 8 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
KTOS vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 5% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). The Boeing Company (BA) offers the better valuation at 93. 2x trailing P/E (4979. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
On trailing P/E, The Boeing Company (BA) is the cheapest at 93.
2x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 73. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
Over the past 5 years, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -36. 3% for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus ACHR's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 205% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 18. 5% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTOS leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTOS leads at 2. 1% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KTOS leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) trades at 73. 5x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4905. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 96. 3% to $12. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
In this comparison, BA (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. KTOS, ACHR, JOBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KTOS or ACHR or JOBY or BA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +94. 6%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KTOS and ACHR and JOBY and BA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.