KWM
K Wave Media Ltd.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-81.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KWM vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+32.3%
KWM vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KWM | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $20M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209K | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -42.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $168K | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $86.81B |
KWM vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KWM
AMZN
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 132.3 | +32.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KWM vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. K Wave Media Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KWM
K Wave Media Ltd.
The Banking Pick
KWM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.90
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 1.95x
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 1.95x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs KWM's -87.9%
- 12.2% margin vs KWM's -42.8%
- +43.7% vs KWM's -87.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs KWM's -42.8% |
| Stability / Safety | KWM | Beta 0.90 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +43.7% vs KWM's -87.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs KWM's -101.7% |
KWM vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
KWM vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGKWM
KWMK Wave Media Ltd.
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KWMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KWM2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 3558992.6x KWM's $208,704. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWM's -42.8%.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208,704 | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KWM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.24x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 95.65x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
KWM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KWM and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-149 for KWM. KWM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -148.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.7% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -146.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167,826 | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
Evenly matched — KWM and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,207 for KWM. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs KWM's -87.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs KWM's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.9% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.6% | +36.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KWM and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KWM is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs KWM's 3.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.48 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.7% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 646K | 45.5M |
Evenly matched — KWM and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KWM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KWM vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KWM or AMZN a better buy right now?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KWM or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -87. 9% for K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus KWM's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KWM or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), K Wave Media Ltd.
(KWM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 67% more volatile than KWM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — KWM or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -42. 8% for K Wave Media Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -42. 9% for KWM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KWM or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is KWM or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, K Wave Media Ltd.
(KWM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KWM: -87. 9%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KWM and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KWM (Financial Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.