KWM
K Wave Media Ltd.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-81.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KWM vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+131.7%
KWM vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KWM | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $20M | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209K | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -42.9% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $168K | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $30.71B |
KWM vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KWM
GOOGL
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 231.7 | +131.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KWM vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 4 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. K Wave Media Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KWM
K Wave Media Ltd.
The Banking Pick
KWM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.90
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 1.95x
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 1.95x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs KWM's -87.9%
- 37.9% margin vs KWM's -42.8%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | GOOGL | 37.9% margin vs KWM's -42.8% |
| Stability / Safety | KWM | Beta 0.90 vs GOOGL's 1.26, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GOOGL | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOGL | +163.5% vs KWM's -87.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOGL | 27.4% ROA vs KWM's -101.7% |
KWM vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
KWM vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGKWM
KWMK Wave Media Ltd.
1leads
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KWMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GOOGL4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KWM2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOOGL4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GOOGL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2024714.4x KWM's $208,704. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWM's -42.8%.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208,704 | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.5% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +81.9% |
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KWM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.24x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 95.65x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.72x |
KWM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-149 for KWM. KWM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOGL's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs KWM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -148.5% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.7% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -146.5% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167,826 | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 392.15x |
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,207 for KWM. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs KWM's -87.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs KWM's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.9% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.6% | +54.8% |
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KWM and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KWM is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs KWM's 3.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.48 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 646K | 28.3M |
Evenly matched — KWM and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | KWMK Wave Media Ltd. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KWM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KWM vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KWM or GOOGL a better buy right now?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KWM or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -87. 9% for K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus KWM's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KWM or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), K Wave Media Ltd.
(KWM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately 40% more volatile than KWM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 14% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — KWM or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -42. 8% for K Wave Media Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -42. 9% for KWM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KWM or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. KWM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is KWM or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, KWM: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KWM and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KWM (Financial Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KWM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.